User talk:Zusty001
Hello, Zusty001, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Discretionary sanctions[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Zusty001. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
October 2022[edit]
Hi Zusty001! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Epiclesis several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Epiclesis, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Do not consider this a proper warning but rather a preemptive notice of policy to prevent violation. Violation of the 3RR policy can lead to an immediate block, but unfortunately it is common for editors to unwittingly violate this policy. You have not violated 3RR on the article Epiclesis as the policy addresses reversions within a 24-hour window. However, our edit warring policy applies more broadly to general unconstructive conduct and may be applicable in this circumstance. Remember to defer towards discussion. Thanks! ~. Pbritti (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Third opinion[edit]
I have listed the discussion Talk:Epiclesis#Nicholas C between you and myself at Wikipedia:Third opinion to enable non-administrative advisement and support in achieving a final consensus. This does not prohibit you from taking further steps to argue your position or request additional input from relevant editors and serves simply to ensure a third editor offers a neutral view on the discussion. Thank you! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
So why don't you clarify it?. With references please. Johnbod (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)