User talk:XuxiRawe22

Welcome[edit]

Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello, XuxiRawe22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, I will always be willing to help or you can ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of one-time characters from The Simpsons has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 19:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ron Hauge constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 19:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wallace Wolodarsky. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Enigma ^msg! 19:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bart the Lover. Will ^(talk) 21:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings[edit]

Hello, I noticed that a lot of your edits are adding extended details to plots and couch gags. We are limited by WP:PLOT which says to keep things as brief as possible. You might be interested in helping out at The Simpsons wiki. It is similar to wikipedia, but has no restraints or notability guidelines, so pretty much anything Simpsons related can have a page there and you can add as much detail as you like. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Papa's Got a Brand New Badge on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted Ken Keeler because (a) the individual episode entries, both of which discuss the controversies, seem like better places to mention any criticism of Keeler and, (b) those entries currently describe and cite fan and Groening disapproval of episodes, not author. Seyfertfan (talk) 00:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons[edit]

Please do not list references to previous episodes Ctjf83Talk 22:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP adding previous episode references. It is Fancruft and we don't list it!! Ctjf83Talk 16:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saturday Evening Puss, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LAA Fan 01:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Park censorship in syndication[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you've added a few items to South Park articles regarding censorship in syndication. You've added a lot and it's all unreferenced, just to let you know I'm thinking of moving it all to the talk page pending cites. Alastairward (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to "Porky's Duck Hunt"[edit]

Hi, recently you made an edit to the Porky's Duck Hunt article, reverting the title of a section from "Later versions" to "Censorship". I'm the one who originally changed the title *from* censorship, and my reasoning (as explained on Talk:Porky's Duck Hunt) is that "censorship" is defined as "The use of state or group power to control freedom of expression, such as passing laws to prevent media from being published or propagated". Quite clearly, while later versions of this cartoon were edited, the reason for the edits was not censorship (unless the original version had had Daffy performing a Nazi salute while doing unmentionable things to Bugs Bunny), but some other reason. This is why I changed the title originally, and why I undid your reversion of the title to "Censorship". If you feel that this is incorrect, then please feel free to add your own viewpoint to the talk page of "Porky's Duck Hunt" :) Xmoogle (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Springfield Connection, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon lists[edit]

Hi Xuxi! I see you have been busy adding details to and improving the grammar of the Lists of Pokémon. Good work! Just be sure you don't make it too crufty, if you know what I mean ;-). Thank you, and happy wiki-ing! Face 15:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concern[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Nutcracker Nightmare article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of South Park residents[edit]

Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with this edit. There is no indication in that episode that the characters were engaged in anal sex, as opposed to vaginal sex. Nightscream (talk) 03:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --> --Brad Polard (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --> Stop removing those facts from the page!--Brad Polard (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Simsons Episodes[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to (various episode descriptions. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Gpia7r (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC) (last warning)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Please don't remove sourced content from articles, as you did with A Tale of Two Springfields. Thank you. The leftorium 20:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Milhouse of Sand and Fog, you will be blocked from editing. WM-86 03:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Simpsons (season 10), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. The leftorium 08:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Trivia and Cultural References from The Simpsons episode articles[edit]

Hi XuxiRawe22,

I don't believe that the complete removal of the Cultural References, Trivia, etc. for the Simpsons episode articles, such as Cultural References section from The Old Man and the "C" Student, is necessary. WP:TRIVIA says that:

Trivia sections should be avoided. If they must exist, they should in most cases be considered temporary, until a better method of presentation can be determined. Lists of miscellaneous information can be useful for developing a new article ... A better way to organize an article is to provide a logical grouping and ordering of facts that gives an integrated presentation, providing context and smooth transitions, whether in text, list, or table.

IMO, until a better way of presenting the information from those trivia sections can be found, all of those sections should stay intact for now, and that you should not be blatantly removing them. --FlyingPenguins (talk) 23:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AGAIN, please stop removing this section. Faethon Ghost (talk) 01:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of The Simpsons couch gags[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of The Simpsons couch gags. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Simpsons couch gags. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Lisa's Pony, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The leftorium 14:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live[edit]

A proposal has been created for WikiProject Saturday Night Live. Please leave comments, and consider joining as a potential project member.Mainly.generic (talk) 13:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]