User talk:Websurfer246
Welcome[edit]
|
Award-winning[edit]
Please take a look at the Film Style Guidelines. The terms 'award-winning', 'Academy Award-winning', 'Academy Award-nominated' etc., have no place in a lead sentence. WikiKingOfMishawaka (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
August 2008[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to The Incredibles. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned about adding 'award-winning' to lead sentences. Further instances will get you blocked. Understand? WikiKingOfMishawaka (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
November 2008[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Resident Evil: Apocalypse. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Awards in intro[edit]
Hi, I just wanted to point out that for film/TV articles that the intro sentence should not include information about the awards it won/was nominated for. If we include it, the article is not following WP:NPOV. It's fine to mention it later in the intro with more explanation, along with other awards it may have won. We don't want to favor one award over another since we're doing an impartial look at the topic. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
january 2009[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Spider-Man 2, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --duo (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Trauma: Life in the E.R.. Ipatrol (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
June 2009[edit]
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009 film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lakeview Terrace. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Dædαlus Contribs 00:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to the RMS Titanic article do not match the numbers shown within the cited source for that data. If you have a change to the data, please provide a reliable source which backs up that change. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Xeworlebi (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
June 2012[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
August 2012[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Presidents of the United States who died in office, you may be blocked from editing. Neelix (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Night to Remember (1958 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The House Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirsten Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Car-Tune Portrait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Ross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben and Kate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NCIS and The Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Generally mixed to negative[edit]
Hi, I reverted your edit at Hey Arnold!: The Movie here, but I thought I'd drop you a direct note to explain my rationale a little better than the edit summary. While used quite often on Wikipedia, the phrase "generally mixed" doesn't really mean anything. People use it to imply that critical reaction was mixed, but ALL critical reaction is mixed. Editors also misuse the phrase "mixed to negative" or "mixed to positive", which again doesn't mean anything. If the response was mixed, that implies both positive and negative. So what are we really trying to say by "mixed to positive"? More positive than negative? At least that says what we mean. Also, when we make these "generally mixed to" claims, we get into a weird area where we as editors are drawing conclusions that may not be explicitly stated in any of the sources. This constitutes WP:SYNTHESIS. WikiProject Film is formally against the use of these phrases. Anyhow, hope that explanation helps more than my edit summary. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
January 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WGBH-TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] neighborhood of Boston, the two stations began operating from that building on August 29, 1963 (the [[ZIP code]] of the station and its post office box address – P.O. Box 350, Boston, MA 02134 –
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Reverting of Edits[edit]
Just a note that if you encounter this particular person's reverting what has been contributed it is not unusual, even for the reason why he stated. There are a couple cantankerous and somewhat possessive about some articles and he is one that receives support for a few other contributors. You might want to include that trivia in M's article. Hope this is useful.
Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Finishing Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ritchie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apaches (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
October 2014[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Brady Bunch, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 18:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
February 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Iron Giant seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
June 2015[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Puzzle Place, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 14:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
July 2015[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lamb Chop's Play-Along. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhDv2.0 05:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
August 2015[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at MacGyver. SummerPhDv2.0 03:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Editorializing about a film's reception[edit]
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted your edit to Jetsons: The Movie. The problem is that you added unsourced editorializing to the reception. We already have a review aggregator, Rotten Tomatoes, cited in that article. We don't need unsourced analysis of the film's reception or interpretation of Rotten Tomatoes' score. This would be original research and is forbidden by Wikipedia policy. What one person considers "negative reviews", another person considers "mixed reviews", and vice versa. This way, we just report the facts. If you can find a reliable source that explicitly says the film received negative reviews, you can certainly add that. Sometimes you can find such articles at Entertainment Weekly or Variety. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Compassionate727. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Land Before Time: Journey of the Brave, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Websurfer246. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
May 2017[edit]
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Mamma Mia! (film).
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Was the note (which you deleted in your edit) unclear? DonIago (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Websurfer246. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shining Time Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angus Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Websurfer246. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Manual of style[edit]
Please do not expand numbers like "$40 million" to "$40,150,246". Per WP:LARGENUM, we prefer to the first style. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
May 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hill Street Blues, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned before, please stop. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 11:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
March 2021[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A Pup Named Scooby-Doo. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 15:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Life to Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Another World. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)