User talk:WEEBATRON1000
|
Schazjmd (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi WEEBATRON1000! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:26, Wednesday, March 10, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Testing out my new signature[edit]
Just ignore this, it's just for testing out signatures. --𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖊🏳️🌈 (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Reliability[edit]
I saw that you asked a question about determining if a source is reliable. WP:RS contains a lot of information, but a reliable source will have gone through some form of peer review or fact checking, be published in a source with a decent reputation for accuracy, and be written by someone who is considered knowledgeable in the field. What counts as reliable depends on the claim: a claim about the medicinal benefits of a drug is going to require much more coverage in reliable sources than a claim about internet phenomenon such as creepypasta. For entries in the List of creepypastas, look for either traditional media sources (like the New Yorker or Time Magazine), academic journals, or pop culture websites (the Daily Dot is generally a good source while Screen Rant is considered acceptable, albeit not the best, for claims about non-biographical internet phenomenon). WP:RSP contains a massive list of various sources and their level of reliability. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)