User talk:Voicewr

Welcome!

Hello, Voicewr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Guettarda (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Las Vegas[edit]

Sentence about tower making McCarron runways unusable needs citation... Spitwater 19:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Hovind[edit]

If there's actually anything significantly wrong in the article, feel free to remove it if you have a source. Otherwise your edits are going to be seen as nonconstructive vandalism and are going to continue to be reverted. - ZoeF (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't re-insert the same material repeatedly into the Hovind article. If you have concerns with the article, please bring them up on the article's talk page. If you want to correct errors in the article, please do so, using reliably sourced material. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kent Hovind. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aramgar (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

— Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also be aware that Wikipedia strongly frowns upon legal threats. When your block expires it would be most helpful if you were to discuss on Talk:Kent Hovind any specific objections you have to the article. JoshuaZ (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, article talk pages are for discussing ways to improve articles, not for ranting about alleged Wikipedia bias. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the above, please review WP:SOAP. If you have a proposal or complaint about Wikipedia overall, please find an appropriate channel for your concerns. Article talk pages are for posting questions and making proposals reasonably aimed at improving the article in question, not for general discussion of the subject of the article, of Wikipedia, or of the editors. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meadowlark Airport[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Meadowlark Airport, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced article on small, non-notable & closed airport

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 07:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]