User talk:User4747474782

Welcome!

Hello, User4747474782! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!

Brookie :) { - like the mist, he's here and then he's gone!} (Whisper...)

09:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Full-logo-green.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Full-logo-green.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Crest-new.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Crest-new.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wellington University logos[edit]

I understand that you are trying to "update" the logo(s), but there are two problems with what you are doing:

First of all, https://www.victoria.ac.nz/our-identity says "the new visual identity we are developing" and https://www.victoria.ac.nz/students/brand-refresh says "The University’s brand refresh will see ... a new Māori name of Te Herenga Waka, which will replace" - so the new identity is apparently neither complete, nor in use yet - indeed the website uses the svg version I placed in the article. We are an encyclopedia, we show what is in use, not what is "being developed". When the new identity is in use then we can rightly update our usage.
Secondly, WP:NFC allows for very limited use of non-free images - one image in the infobox is generally all that is justified for identification purposes. To justify an additional non-free image you would need need reliably sourced third party commentary specifically concerning the extra logo and it's visual appearance in the article. Just adding a caption or a brief mention isn't enough. In other words, you need to find reliable sources which discuss the logo and it's visual appearance in the context of the subject of the article, in sufficient depth that give it context and significance, enough that the reader would be disadvantaged by not having visual context for the image. If you think you can find that, let me know, and I might be able to help you construct something. It would need to be content that would not be considered WP:UNDUE, from independent reliable sources, and which consensus would agree is significant enough that the text should be included in the article regardless of whether the image is, not just something tangentially related used to "shoehorn" the image in.
Finally, once any new logo actually comes into use we would much prefer an SVG version, for quality. Once it is in use, if you are having difficulty finding an svg version, or formatting it to comply with our NFC requirements, please let me know, and I'll be happy to try and help. Often SVGs can be extracted from website HTML code, or from PDF documents when they are not immediately apparent. -- Begoon 04:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]