User talk:Usamanaeem31

May 2023[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 17:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to National Logistics Cell has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hello, Usamanaeem31. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 12:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is National Logistics Corporation. The discussion is about the topic National Logistics Corporation. Thank you. -- Pemilligan (talk) 17:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usamanaeem31 (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I realize that this goes against Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and verifiability. I thought my edits was not in favor of the topic but describing there image what are they. Usamanaeem31 (talk) 06:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you have persisted in editing contrary to the guideline on conflict of interest, despite having been informed of that guideline, and because it is clear that almost your only purpose of your editing is to enhance the reputation of the organisation you work for by suppressing any information unfavourable to it.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear,

I am writing to appeal for the unblocking of my account. I understand that my editing behavior was not in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest, and I apologize for any disruption or violation caused.

I acknowledge that my edits were primarily focused on enhancing the reputation of the organization I work for and may have suppressed unfavorable information. I realize now that this goes against Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and verifiability.

I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially those regarding conflict of interest. I will make constructive edits based on reliable sources and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.

I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or disruption my previous editing may have caused, and I hope for the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future.

Thank you for considering my appeal. Usamanaeem31 (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want your request for an unblock to be reviewed by an administrator, follow the instructions above. If you don't, it's entirely likely that your request may never be seen by anyone except you and me, as it won't appear in the list of pending unblock requests. I also advise you that it is unlikely that any administrator will unblock you unless you give an indication of editing you are likely to do on subjects other than your organisation. As far as I am concerned, I will leave the matter to you and any administrator who reviews any future unblock request you may post. Any such administrator is welcome to deal with the matter as they see fit, without consulting me. JBW (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Usamanaeem31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wiki Team,

I am writing to appeal for the unblocking of my account. I understand that my editing behavior was not in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest, and I apologize for any disruption or violation caused.

I acknowledge that my edits were primarily focused on enhancing the reputation of the organization I work for and may have suppressed unfavorable information. I realize now that this goes against Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and verifiability.

I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially those regarding conflict of interest. I will make constructive edits based on reliable sources and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.

I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or disruption my previous editing may have caused, and I hope for the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future.

Thank you for considering my appeal. Usamanaeem31 (talk) 08:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Bot generated requests are not accepted(GPTzero says 88% likely AI generated). We want to hear from you, not a bot, because it is not the bot that is blocked. You are. Please write your request in your own words without using an AI or bot. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Usamanaeem31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mean it what apology I have written unblock my account I am trying to learn and study how Wikipedia worked. can you please provide me another chance to prove myself by unblocking? Usamanaeem31 (talk) 09:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Usamanaeem31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand I have been blocked for not following the guidelines on conflict of interest despite having been informed of that guideline. 2. I sincerely apologize for the disruption my previous editing may have caused, and 3. I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will make useful constructive edits based on reliable sources and contribute positively instead of repeating my previous mistakes. Usamanaeem31 (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To know that you won't repeat previous mistakes, we need to know that you know what those are. Please tell us and what steps you will take to change. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Usamanaeem31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my previous editing behavior was not following Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. My mistakes included editing articles related to the organization I work for in a way that could be seen as biased or promotional. Now, I will focus on making useful and constructive edits based on reliable sources, without any bias or promotional intent. Usamanaeem31 (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were basically saying that your company is the best. The fact that you think there's some way to see this as not being promotional or biased is hard to believe and throws into question your ability to write neutral text. It also implies that you think it was perfectly fine, but you're willing to concede that we think it's promotion. That leads me to believe that you're not really a good fit for this website. Given that this is your fourth unblock request, I'm revoking your ability to make more. You can still appeal via UTRS as below, but I would suggest that you simply find a website that's more aligned to your purposes, such as a social media website, where you can create an official presence that's curated by the company itself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Could be seen as..." ??? JBW (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.