User talk:Tsudeck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tsudeck, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Tsudeck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 00:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelli Ward article[edit]

Sorry. I just noticed you wanting to contact me for the first time. How do we conduct a conversation on this matter in which one of us is continuing to add or delete material. What your adding, goes beyond the pale and is considerably longer than the rest of the entire page. I believe you are definitely involved in the McCain campaign and that is your true motivation. If you are not, you certainly have put an enormous amount of time and effort to malign Dr. Ward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerCG1 (talkcontribs) 21:00, July 19, 2016‎

RogerCG1, I didn't see your response here till now. I will check this page from now on. However, in following other comments on the talk section of the page Kelli Ward, we should discuss there from here on out.Tsudeck (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kelli Ward. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Tsudeck, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kelli Ward has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions - American politics[edit]

I see that you have once again re-inserted the material discussed on the article talk page into the Kelli Ward article, without there being consensus to do so. Please be aware that the article Kelli Ward is covered by WP:ARBAPDS, specifically: "standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people". The material you have been slow-edit-warring back into the article is not in accordance with the WP:BLP policy, and must not be re-added until there is consensus to do so on the talk page of the article.

Also, the edit summary you used was grossly misleading. I am going to assume good faith and imagine that this was merely an error on your part rather than being deliberate -- but please be more careful with edit summaries in future. MPS1992 (talk) 10:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tsudeck. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cashless Society".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]