User talk:Truth,2

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Truth,2, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lklundin (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Truth,2[edit]

I opened a topic about your behavior at ANI.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why you don't explain if you have different sources?

My source is a published book:

""Documents from the archives opened in 1992 also showed that the decision was also illegal in other respects. Neither had the Supreme Soviet in Moscow voted on the subject, nor the one in Kiev, but, what was inadmissible, only their presidencies. Almost half of the members of these committees were missing, which must be understood as a demonstrative vote against this arbitrary decision and meant, that they were not formally legitimized. Protest also came from the First Secretary of the Communist Party in Crimea, Pavel Titov, who had been cited to Moscow to receive the notification of the change of ownership. He was then removed and replaced by Ukrainian Dmytro Polianski." The external occasion for this generous "gift" of Moscow to Kiev was the 300th anniversary of the Treaty of Peresyaslav."Truth,2 (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for tendentious editing, specifically belligerent POV pushing and obviously being NOTHERE. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truth,2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I was reverted without any message nor in the history nor in the talk page 2. I was reverted with a small notion of original research, what is simply not true. The Chapter in the book refers to a historic case. My answer to Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you wrote about Asarow concerns political reasons not scientific. "the mayerial you attempted to add contradicts to everything else in the article": No, the points are missing in the article, and this is the reason why I added it. The 100 %-votes were of course not the reality. They were typic for the Communists at that time.

And what happened before is still missing!

- I expected that somebody may take a closer look to the Soviet constitution of that time.

- How should this decision made legally.

- What happened in reality?

- Why came a new First Secretary of the Communist Party in Crimea? etc.Truth,2 (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For me these are questions that would help to improve the article Truth,2 (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you only want to push your opinion on what happened then there's no reason to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 00:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As far as I understand, it's not an opinion. There are facts that should be first falsified if they aren't true. Prof. Asarow reports in this case - as far as I understand - only the History. I assume that nobody of the critics has read the source. Also nobody gave a different source.Truth,2 (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]