User talk:TobiaskGVA

Hello, TobiaskGVA. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DMacks,

Thank you for your message.

The list of notable open source health software is currently missing the teleconsultation platforms all together.

HCW@home is one of the few institutional grade open-source platforms offering teleconsultations. It matches all criteria of open source requirements reason why it was listed as public digital good https://app.digitalpublicgoods.net/a/11127.

It is used by state hospitals, clinics and NGOs such as ICRC. In today's landscape, it is definitely one of the solutions someone would consider when researching the topic of open source software for telemedecine/teleconsultation reason why we have included it in this list.

Please let me know if you need additional elements on the matter.

Thank you for your consideration into this topic.

Kind regards,

Tobias TobiaskGVA (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had the wrong links in my message... "should have"...it should refer to our "general notability guideline" and "pre-existing article" should link to our "write the article first" recommendation for helping comply with it. Essentially it is not my, your, or any other WP editor's judgement about importance of something or whether we want to recommend it to others. DMacks (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit again without complying with the provisions of the conflict of interest guideline and the other related considerations mentioned above. Also please don't edit any page both with and without being logged into your account, as doing so may lead to confusion. JBW (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Healthcare worker at home (HCW@home) (March 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Healthcare worker at home (HCW@home) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TobiaskGVA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]