User talk:Tkondaks
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. Femto 15:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Your addition of the people magazine blurb was a welcomed addition, however the link to the scan belongs in the reference or notes section, which I changed it to. It does not belong in the actual article itself. The addition has a reference number next to it, which directs the reader to the notes section where they can click on the link and see the scan for themselves. Wikipedia is not like other websites where external links are all throughout the page. They are in the Notes/Reference sections and the External Links section. Please do not reinsert it without discussin it on the article's talk page. This seems to follow the same thing User:Femto was describing to you above. Donaldd23 11:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments...I'm new to this, so I'm not even sure that you'll get these comments! As for your suggestion: makes sense but I'm confused because the way I made the link I thought was the most practical for the reader...instead of having to scroll down to a footnote, he can just click onto the link right from the text...indeed, this seems to be the practise in many parts of Wikipedia and that's why I tried to copy the format.
- While that style is used in some articles on Wikipedia it is incorrect. I try to correct them as I seem them, as do others. Only internal links to other Wikipedia articles should be linked within an article. External links should be linked only in notes/reference/external link sections. Also, the blurb is more about the film than about Jerry Lewis and it does not belong in the trivia section of the actor's article. Please only keep it in the film article. Thanks! Donaldd23 14:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Typosquatting[edit]
The examples you placed in Typosquatting, while interesting, would form an article by themselves, referenced by a "See also" in Typosquatting. However, do please use care with WP:OR and WP:RS. One's own Google document is unlikely to be a valid source. Fiddle Faddle 16:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
February 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Alberta separatism do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 22:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
May 2010[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ckatzchatspy 22:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
December 2010[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 02:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)