User talk:Thodef

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thodef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! œ^™ 03:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Disclosure Project has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Coldplay Expert 10:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Protocols of the Elders of Zion

1. You're wrong about the year of first publication. It was 1903, not 1901.
2. There are several spellings - transliterations of the Russian - of Nilus' first name. However, the most common English language translation is "Serge." Since this is the English language Encyclopedia, we've selected the latter. --Ludvikus (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• Good luck to you, and Welcome to Wikipedia. --Ludvikus (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• Hello. The two (2) PSM texts you found are not First editions by the original tertiary editors. You should be extremely careful - because these texts are often 7th editions of originals which have been edited several times by anonymous editors, or unreliable editors. I left two (2) detailed responses on the Talk page of the articles. Don't believe that you have a book you're looking for just because of its title. You'll be surprised if you look very, very, closely, how sneaky the publishers are. --Ludvikus (talk) 21:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• I've REVERTED your out-of-sequence remarks which distort my meaning. ALWAYS put your new comments BELOW. Otherwise you make my remarks look stupid. You don't want to do that, do you? --Ludvikus (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

PS: You can find the Original 1934 edition of this "book" in microform at the New York Public Library. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)