User talk:TheSwedishPorcupine

October 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dieter F. Uchtdorf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas S. Monson, you may be blocked from editing. Bahooka (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSwedishPorcupine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't vandalizing. My edits were all properly cited. Please reverse this blockTheSwedishPorcupine (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please go find your lulz elsewhere. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For everyone else's information, this is highly likely to be the latest troll sock of LTA User:GeraldFord1980 based on the pattern of trolling and the filter log. Given that this account is already blocked, I don't think there's a need to open an SPI, but any reviewing admin should be aware. --FyzixFighter (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]