User talk:ThatCheeseGuy

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ThatCheeseGuy, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dideye Dito (July 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 94rain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please find third-party sources from media, books or journals that addresses the subject directly and in detail. A resubmission without reliable sources that make this subject pass WP:GNG may be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dideye Dito and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dideye Dito, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

94rain ^Talk 06:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using Wikipedia for promotion[edit]

Hello, I'm Ponyo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for articles about things you hope will someday become notable. It is a place for articles about subjects which have already become notable, as evidenced by substantive coverage in reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notable to you isn't the same as notable to people in my community. Just cuz it isn't on cnn or tv all over the gloabe doesn't mean it isn't notable to some people. I made my articel BEACUSE it has become more notable througout my community.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatCheeseGuy (talk • contribs)

Then where are the references to articles in newspapers, magazines, journals, books, etc.? Our definition of notability is quite clear, and "it got mentioned in a blog I like (that you probably never heard of)" does not meet that definition. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You mods sure are good at being pricks