User talk:TawlinMiki

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Identifies me personally with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of NewmansOwnEncylopedia (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:TalkBoyTapeRecorder. Cst17 (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TawlinMiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Whaaaaaaaat!? I'm no sockpuppet! TawlinMiki (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

bye! NawlinWiki (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.