User talk:TSKang96

Link for new page:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolutionary_psychological_and_biological_explanations_of_prostitution&action=edit&redlink=1

TSKang96 (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TSKang96. You have new messages at User talk:RexxS/Warwick.
Message added 16:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Moving to mainspace[edit]

Please don't do that. I copied the draft for you solely to make a pdf as you requested, not for you to move the userspace version into mainspace to be worked on further. As a result, the present article now doesn't contain attribution to the editors who contributed to the draft. You've caused the problem of breaching the CC-BY-SA licence until I can arrange for a history merge. --RexxS (talk) 22:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Already dumped into main-space - that is not the way to secure a good article in Wikipedia

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TSKang96, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:TSKang96/Evolutionary psychological and biological explanations for prostitution[edit]

Hi TSKang96, I have moved the page you were working on ("Evolutionary psychological and biological explanations for prostitution") into your 'userspace'. You can find it here. While it's in user space you can make edits to the page. Nev1 (talk) 11:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evolutionary psychological and biological explanations for prostitution (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This draft is not substantially different from the article that was deleted through the AFD process.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TSKang96/Evolutionary psychological and biological explanations for prostitution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution (December 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One, the page name itself is not quite fitting for an encyclopedia article, and two, is perhaps best suited at another closely related article given its size.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evolutionary Psychological and Biological Explanations for Prostitution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evolutionary explanations for prostitution (January 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

The article is almost entirely original research and synthesized findings. I can't find any real evidence that this is a topic that has received any significant depth of coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evolutionary explanations for prostitution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 04:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evolutionary explanations for prostitution concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Evolutionary explanations for prostitution, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]