User talk:Superbrickbro

Elizer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elizer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizer (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elizer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Superbrickbro! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizer (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 94rain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elizer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

94rain ^Talk 03:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

AVM Productions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gope and Ragini

Kismet (1943 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arun Kumar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If I continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vidya, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding subjects with no articles to disambiguation pages. If you would like to create a new article, simply start one in draft space or as a user subpage Breawycker (talk to me!) 20:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC) You are stupid!

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

AVM Productions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gope and Ragini

List of Bollywood films of 1955 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Padmini and Ragini

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

K. N. Dandayudhapani Pillai

If you think there is a spelling error, please move the page. --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you recently removed content from Air India Flight 182 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vidya. Paisarepa (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your response on my talk page is copied here: Paisarepa, hi, it's Superbrickbro. Please try to understand that Vidya Shankar is a real person and not some made up thing. Please do not delete Vidya Shankar from the page because every time you or anybody else deletes Vidya Shankar, you are vandalizing the page. Vidya Shankar can be there and isn't being a virus to the page. Stop deleting Vidya Shankar or I will report you and everyone else as vandalizers. This is all I want to write: *Vidya Shankar, a South Indian Veena player, and musicologist who was a member of the Madras Music Academy in Chennai, India. Please believe me: Vidya Shankar is a real person and was a veena player. she was a very well known member of the Music Academy in Chennai, India. If you want to delete this because there is no article for Vidya Shankar, please also delete Vidya, a bimonthly journal published by the Triple Nine Society as said above as there is no article to it as well. Here is the Hindu article link proving that she died in 2010: https://www.thehindu.com/arts/Vainika-Vidya-Shankar-no-more/article16204888.ece. please don't delete Vidya Shankar as she was still a real singer. Also, this isn't vandalism as I'm just telling other editors something. if you don't believe that Vidya Shankar is real, go look up the Hindu article proving that she died in 2010, please.

As you are fully aware, having been told three times now by three different people (myself, User talk:Breawycker, and Gorthian on his edit summary), your edits to the Vidya Disambiguation Page are disruptive, and repeatedly reverting the edits without making an attempt to resolve the underlying issues is not appropriate. What is especially inappropriate is your response to Breawycker's notification on your talk page; you simply responded with the blatant personal attack 'You are stupid!'

As you have already been asked, please refer to WP:DAB and MOS:DAB before simply replacing an edit that has been reverted multiple times already. And please review the etiquette guidelines WP:WQ before communicating with other editors in the manner that you have been. Your communication and behavior will get you blocked from editing if you don't change it. Thanks. Paisarepa (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Paisarepa (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Vidya Shankar

Disambiguation pages are supposed to guide readers to an article they’re looking for, so if there is no article, it’s useless to them. A red link is only useful if there’s a blue link to guide the reader to an article with that same red link, but where presumably, there is at least a little information. I found Vidya Shankar in Sangeet Natak Akademi Award, so I was able to add her to the disambiguation page at Vidya. It’s clear she’s notable and you’re interested in her; I encourage you to write an article so that she’s no longer a red link.

There’s a LOT to learn about editing at Wikipedia, and I see you’re very new, so give yourself time to absorb some of the skills needed. Don’t just keep adding something to a page over and over; that gets frustrating for everyone involved, and could lead to your being blocked from editing. I look forward to seeing you around. Cheers! — Gorthian (talk) 01:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 72 hours for edit-warring and otherwise disruptive edits at Vidya and for personal attacks against other editors, i.e., calling them vandals. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Superbrickbro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After Gorthian told me what to about editing and how to edit properly, I understand that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what you are blocked for, and I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead by not constantly reverting edits and calling other editors mean names. I'm very very sorry for my vandalism and I will not do it again. After Gorthian explained in a nice and not vigorous way what I was doing was wrong, I realized that I will stop my vandalizing editing. Please let me continue to edit and left the 72-hour ban. If I vandalize again please tell me in a nice way what I'm doing wrong and if I continue to vandalize, you can ban me for longer. Thank you for understanding, ----Superbrickbro

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for vandalism. It seems like you don't understand what you were blocked for. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For some reason, the timer on my block is done but the block hasn't expired yet, so can someone explain this?

A couple of tips

There are a couple of very basic things you need to do when you’re editing Wikipedia. One is to sign every comment you leave that isn’t on an article. You do this by typing four tildes at the end of your comment: ~~~~ The software will turn that into your username (and the time) when you publish the comment.

The second thing you should do is add an WP:EDITSUMMARY to every edit you make, so people can look at the history of a page and have some idea of what you did.

One more tip: do NOT revert someone’s edit over and over. That is called edit warring, and was what got you blocked already once. The best policy is what’s called BRD, where after you Boldly make an edit, and you get Reverted, you Discuss the situation on the talk page of the article to figure out a solution together.

As I said earlier, there is a LOT to learn about editing Wikipedia, including dizzying rules and an intricate structure of community. GO SLOWLY and thoughtfully, click on links, and you’ll learn. Happy editing! — Gorthian (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kumari Kamala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Shair (1949 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shair (1949 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Bhakta (1955 film) (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Whispering were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Superbrickbro / Shiv Bhakta (1955 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Superbrickbro / Shiv Bhakta (1955 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 13:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Superbrickbro, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to User:Superbrickbro / Shiv Bhakta (1955 film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to T. A. Madhuram, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mjs1991 (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Musafir (1957 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

History-merging Draft:Elizer to Elizer

• There was nothing to history-merge in. Draft:Elizer's edit contained only one edit, and that edit was a redirect. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranjan (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mangamma Sapatham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Bhakta (1955 film) (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Superbrickbro/Shiv Bhakta (1955 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Superbrickbro/Shiv Bhakta (1955 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Your addition to Shiv-Bhakta (1955 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove the {{copyvio/core}} template from articles, as you did with Special:Diff/913580532. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Miss Malini

Yes, there is a songbook of the film at The Cinema Resource Centre. Unfortunately, I'm not finding the time to visit it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

I mean, their OFFICE has it. You need to visit them and ask permission for seeing, but you can't keep it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

How do you know the credits order in this film? The film is lost, and I have not found any press or songbook related to it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Savithiri (1941 film)

I started writing articles in October 2013 under various topics. I have written more than 150 articles on old Tamil films. Now, for the last few months, I do not write articles in the same vein as before because of some unwanted edits on my articles. Your recent edit is one example. I went through your talk page and was able to understand about your edits. Therefore, I have decided not to pursue this matter any further.--UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 00:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Your addition to Jagathalaprathapan (1944 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nandakumar (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page T. R. Mahalingam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vidya Shankar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vidya Shankar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thehindu.com/arts/Vainika-Vidya-Shankar-no-more/article16204888.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:42, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Superbrickbro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, today my father (account: NewtonRam) created a Wikipedia account. He was trying to edited an article on his teacher, who was a renowned musician. This is the year of her birth centenary. I was showing him how to cite references properly but I copied a whole page of the hindu article I was referencing and hit publish. The reason why I copied the whole article was to just get the most important points (family and date of death), and then was going to delete everything else, as to not make it sound like someone else's words. (I had learned from previous warnings that a total copy from another source was very bad and could result in a copyright violation). Also there was no mis-intent or sock puppetry used between the two accounts, but we could not explain this immediately to the user Bbb23 as my account and our IP got blocked. Can you please excuse this error and unblock my account, my dad's account (NewtonRam), and our Ip address? We were not trying to use any form sock puppetry as one account is mine (Superbrickbro) and the other is my dad's (NewtonRam) because my dad just wanting to create an account and edit his own articles (I was trying to help him get started and showing him what to do and what not to do). Thank you for understanding and we would greatly appreciate your help.Superbrickbro (talk) 00:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Superbrickbro

Decline reason:

This is a clear violation of WP:MEAT and WP:COI. Thank you for also admitting to violating WP:COPYRIGHT. However, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block here.Yamla (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why? It was a mistake that I seriously didn't know I was making.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Superbrickbro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So do you actually think that I was using abusing another account to do bad things? Ever since I joined Wikipedia, my goal was just to edit old Indian films and not do anything else. Also I didn't what meat puppetry was before this happened. When my dad started to get interested in what I was doing, I helped him create an New account (during this time I had not been banned yet for sock puppetry, but also didn’t realize that having to accounts on the same IP address was bad). When I copied a whole text from another source just to take the most essential information (death date, and family relationships) and then deleting everything thing as to not have a copyright violation. But as I went to highlight the paragraph to be removed, the cursor on my computer just started moving in an uncontrolled way (that the mouse could not move away, but the mouse’s buttons still worked. As it went to the publish button, I tried to move it way, but instead I accidentally pressed the the right mouse button and hit publish. As soon as I did this, I had a message on my talk page for a speedy deletion of the article (Draft:Vidya Shankar) me and my dad were adding to, because of copyright infringement. And then are IP adress was blocked until December 12 and then my father’s account (NewtonRam) was banned because according to a checkuser, it was a sockpuppet of Superbrickbro. And then I was banned indefinitely from abusing multiple accounts all because of one single mistake. So please lift this block because I think if I had known how to make legitimate accounts on the same IP first none of this would happen. Again I didn’t mean to abuse multiple accounts I was just trying to help my dad create an account so he can edit his articles and I can edit my articles. Thank youSuperbrickbro (talk) 15:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Superbrickbro

Decline reason:

O, what a tangled web we weave. I note that you've omitted this account, created days after your block, from said web. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Superbrickbro, if you vandalize an admin's decline of your unblock request again, I will revoke Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

But Bbb23, Ohnoitsjamie did not at all say anything about what I had said and just wrote, O, what a tangled web we weave. which talks about him not the block request, and then talks about the other account Zippythechimp345. I don't think it is vandalism because he didn't address my request at all. Also when you decline this request, don't say "you have been declined to be unblocked because the block request does not address the block. Please respond to what I am sayingSuperbrickbro (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie declined your unblock request because you did not address your socking with Zippythechimp345. If you don't do that, the likelihood is your Talk page access will be revoked for wasting our time.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shair (1949) film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shair (1949) film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Help, I have a question

When my ip adress gets unblocked on December 12, can I still create a new account or not. If I can, can an administrator tell me what to do and not do when creating this new account. If I can't please tell why and don't be harsh. Again when I made this mistake, I didn't know I was doing something wrong. In real life I'm not a dishonest person, I just didn't understand how to use wikipedia entirely before I got banned indefinitely. Thank you, Sincerely,Superbrickbro (talk) 04:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Superbrickbro

You have an open unblock request; "help me" tags are unnecessary. You cannot create a new account until you are unblocked. Creating additional accounts while blocked is block evasion. Blocks are on the person themselves, not merely their account. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

My friend has wiki account as well, can he log in to wiki on my computer or will he get blocked immediately?Superbrickbro (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Superbrickbro

Let me outline what you've already been told:

1. help me templates are not for unblocks
2. You may not create an account or edit under any name or IP address until you as an individual are unblocked on this account.
3. It is ill advised for your friend to edit from your device. Praxidicae (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

• I've revoked Talk page access partly because of persistent refactoring despite warnings.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

bbb23 might wanna give the same treatment to this one Praxidicae (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vidya Shankar

Hello, Superbrickbro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vidya Shankar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)