User talk:SunniObserver786
May 2019[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliyar. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing my attention to this rule. I understand the need to prevent edit warring, unfortunately in this case my edit is actually being wrongly accused to be defamatory and removed by a non-impartial individual. I would appreciate if my contribution to that page were re-added again as if you read them I'm sure you will see they are appropriately sourced and not defamatory. This user is also trying to wrongly report my account simply for making this edit. SunniObserver786 (talk) 13:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Asjad Raza Khan for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asjad Raza Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asjad Raza Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AjmedRazviAlHusainy (talk) 06:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The discussion page was never created, and the page is not currently listed for deletion. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Asjad Raza Khan for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asjad Raza Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asjad Raza Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 21:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SunniObserver786! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Photo of Akhtar Raza Khan[edit]
Dear friend, you cannot simply remove a photo because you say the person in the photo would object to it. That’s not how Wikipedia works. If you personally disagree with the photo you still have no right to impose your view on the Wikipedia community. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. I have read the Wikipedia rules, which state that not all photos are acceptable, such as "those that are unfairly obtained" and "those that unreasonably intrude into the subject's private or family life"[1]. In the case of Akhtar Raza Khan, due to religious beliefs, he prohibited photography[2] and so any photo is a blatant invasion of his privacy. I think the Wikipedia community would understand that his photo is such a sensitive topic and as a compromise, mention can be made either on the page or the talk page about his views on photography which explain why his photo is not displayed. Hope you understand the sensitivity of this matter. SunniObserver786 (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- While I can understand your viewpoint there have been unsuccessful attempts to remove this image previously. Individuals can remove the photographs from their rendered display if necessary, which should be sufficient if it upsets you. If you wish to change Wikipedia then ask at WP:TEAHOUSE or other help links above about the correct way to raise an RFC proposal; any other action is likely to be seen as disruptive. There are I things I do not like about WikiPedia policy but it is necessary to go with consensus. Alternatively it may help if you raise Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam and perhaps an RFC could be raised at MOS:ISLAM which might allow for a change of policy in particular circumstances — pragmatically I do not think your chances of success are high but I could be wrong. Removing images as you have done here, or poorly raised discussions, may well be seen as disruptive, at worst case leading to a block. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining this. There was no malice intended in removing the photograph, I had no idea previous attempts had already been made to remove the photograph and that such an edit would be so contentious. I will explore the options you have provided to hopefully bring the issue to an amicable conclusion. As mentioned previously, this is not a problem about upsetting me personally but more about respecting the wishes of the deceased and his family. SunniObserver786 (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Asjad Raza Khan for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asjad Raza Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Sonofstar (talk) 20:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Asjad Raza Khan moved to draftspace[edit]
Thanks for your contributions to Asjad Raza Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Khwiser (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)