User talk:Stuckerj

Regarding teleological argument and a welcome!

Hi, Stuckerj. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that I responded on the talk page to your comment. I would appreciate your comments here. Thank you for taking the time to write a meaningful edit summary! Below is the standard welcome message; I find it rather impersonal, but hopefully it will be helpful to you. :)

Welcome!

Hello, Stuckerj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  —HorsePunchKid→龜 06:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

ID

Fabulous. — goethean ॐ 19:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

• If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.--Gandalf2000 01:59, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Bill Gothard

Thanks for your edits to Bill Gothard. You may want to keep an eye on the recent changes to that and and Institute in Basic Life Principles for the next week or so, as the Gothard article was mentioned in a popular ati-related blog. --DDerby-(talk) 07:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

CCC

Honestly, there were a lot of organizations on campus with similar names and acronyms. One of my roommates Freshman year joined the group that I *think* was the CCC, and that I know had previously been banned from campus because of proselytizing misbehaviour. As a result, I had a close up and personal view of their tactics. That said, I'm not certain that I remember who "they" were, and I do not want to pin any accusations on CCC unfairly. Uucp 21:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

1105 Media

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1105 Media, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.linkedin.com/companies/1105-media. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1105 Media

A tag has been placed on 1105 Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLetterM (talk) 16:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Interested in dipping in your oar?

You previously commented on the Oliver DeMille article. It is currently being reviewed and revised by myself and another editor who do not see eye to eye. I would appreciate your input, if you're willing.Ibinthinkin (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)