User talk:Stirling7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Stirling7. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Iamahashtag (talk) 03:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Auroracoin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auroracoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auroracoin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:Original research, WP:Verifiability, WP:Reliable sources, WP:Consensus and WP:BRD. There is no consensus on the talk page for your edits, and your looking at the birth certificate and making your own evaluation of it is a violation of our proscription against original research. When a preponderance of the experts on the subject accept Otto Hitler's revised birth date, then it can appear in our article. At the moment there is one scholar and one author who -- to my knowledge -- have accepted it. That's not sufficient. I've reverted your edits, do not restore the information to the article until you have a consensus to do so on the talk page.

Note that failure to abide by our policies can lead to your being blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]