User talk:Stellmach
- Manual of Style
- How to write a great article
- New contributors' help page
- Where to ask a question
- Help Desk
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Conflict resolution
- Pages needing attention
- Peer review
- Utilities
Dark Galaxy[edit]
Hi, I've moved your comment from the Dark Galaxy talk page to the AfD page. If you'd like to change your comment (such as whether you feel the article should be deleted or not), feel free to do so. --Wafulz 14:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The author of that page asked about why it was marked as spam here. You may be interested. I've removed the question from there, as that's the wrong place for it, but as it seemed reasonably polite, I thought I'd let you know. JesseW, the juggling janitor 18:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Carter Genealogy[edit]
Yeah, I was kind of suspicious of the President and singers being 'distantly related'. So I did some careful googling, and found that, which I think rules out the two lines being related, for all intents and purposes. I have not seen any evidence about the Elvis link, but the same source says there is concrete proof, so that's good enough for me. P.S. Usually people post comments on another user's talk page, not their user page... Alcuin 11:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
John Dexter[edit]
(And? Tell us more.)
- Yeah, OK, give me a chance! I am currently working on the Royal National Theatre page which is full of red links, and I'm trying to get rid of them by creating stubs for Dexter, Michael Blakemore and others. Please don't fret. They will be fleshed out soon. Orbicle 17:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- No worries; that's why God created {{hangon}}. It's hard to tell from just looking at such wee new articles. Best of luck with it! -Stellmach 17:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Lost Highway Records site[edit]
Regarding the Whiskeytown Lost Highway Records link, being "official" doesn't make a site not linkspam. Every online store out there is "official" from the vendor's point of view.
In this particular case, there is no content at that link about Whiskeytown other than a promotional paragraph (labelled "Biography" but not actually containing any biographical information) and a link to buy the band's product.
Please take a closer look at what's actually on that site, and compare to Wikipedia:External links regarding link spamming. If Whiskeytown have a more useful web site than their label's online sales portal, I trust you to find it and improve the article. --Stellmach 13:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Honestly, I think that it fits the criteria of not being link spam. Yes, their record is being sold there, but however, it is the only official web site they currently have by nature of the band being broken up for seven years, and on top of that, the site also includes free audio samples, which one could argue is quite relevant for people interested in the band. Leave it in. - Stick Fig 13:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Joiner[edit]
I've just fixed Template:Infobox musical artist. I don't know if you've done it to any other pages, but for future information,  is the Unicode byte-order mark. Since I edited that template I discovered [1] that its primary name is indeed "ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE" - I've no idea why this codepoint should be allowed to have two meanings; in SeaMonkey 1.0.5 (Mac) at least, it renders as an unknown character glyph. OTOH, ‍ is "ZERO WIDTH JOINER" and renders OK on both SeaMonkey and Safari. -- Smjg 21:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
RE: Johnny Cash genres[edit]
And you honestly think only rock musicians are inducted...? That's part of why the R&R Hall of Fame is said to be a joke: musicians who aren't "rock 'n roll" or "rock" are being inducted (such as Johnny Cash). Pretty common knowledge, really. -- User:RattleandHum 1 November 2006
- I'll grant that they induct people based on historical significance as well as genre of work. Nevertheless, the claim that Cash wasn't a rock n' roll artist is absurd on the face of it. One need only listen to any of his Sun Records catalog. -Stellmach 21:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar[edit]
Here is something for you, for all your contributions to game related articles on wikipeida. Regards -Angelbo 01:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Überplay[edit]
I only just now saw what I can only regard as your childish vandalism of the Überplay article during its AfD discussion. Please don't do that sort of thing. -Stellmach 18:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Is this supposed to be a warning, or are you just speaking your mind? I assume you noticed I haven't edited that article in months, don't you think it's a little late for "please don't do that sort of thing"? Reswobslc 20:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
CVG Barnstar[edit]
Thank you for trimming the list of "Notable published titles" list in the Activision article. For your meritous work, I hereby award you the CVG Barnstar!
|
The CVG Barnstar | |
| Stellmach has been award the CVG Star for his trimming of the "Notable published titles" list in the Activision article — Frecklefσσt | Talk |
Thank you and congratulations! — Frecklefσσt | Talk 18:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Stellmach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Stellmach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of LCR (dice game) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LCR (dice game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LCR (dice game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)