User talk:Ss prod

Welcome!

Hi Ss prod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 19:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joële Walinga (November 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject maybe notable but needs more WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joële Walinga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ss prod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiebuba hey, thanks for the feedback, but I'm not clear on the reasoning. None of the references provided are just passing mentions -- each are features entirely about the artist or about one of her projects. There are also many more articles on this subject, just not ones which fit into the citation context of a bio. A recent feature on her new film in Variety Magazine, as an example. I'd appreciate a second look at the article as I'm not sure this feedback is appropriate for the citations provided and for the general media coverage of the subject. 2001:818:E81D:C000:8547:EDAE:5E4E:B56A (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews with the subject of the article are of no use in establishing notability. We don't care what the subject says about themselves; instead we need to know what independent reliable sources say about them. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that clarification. Could you please review the sources on the article to clarify whether these do in fact not qualify? These are not just interviews, but articles on the subject by independent and reliable sources, some of them major in the film industry. This subject has been written about extensively so if there are any articles which you'd like to flag, I can take a look and find an appropriate replacement to your standards, or remove the statement in the article. Thank you so much for your help with this. Ss prod (talk) 12:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joële Walinga (November 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joële Walinga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your review. I wonder if you could provide some further clarity for me? For reference, here is a Wikipedia article for another Canadian filmmaker, which has less significant coverage than the article I am submitting. Can you please tell me the difference between the two and how I can correct my submission? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Shim Ss prod (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joële Walinga[edit]

Hello, Ss prod. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joële Walinga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]