User talk:Skrooball

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Skrooball, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ageo020 04:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skroobal - Steve Irwin is not a memorial page. I understand you are upset by Irwin's death - But there are other places to memorialize Irwin. WhisperToMe 04:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. — The Future 04:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Wright name?[edit]

Where have you found Wright's name given as "Vincent Ernest" and not "Ernest Vincent"? I've never seen it that way; please cite. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, quite a few of your edits look bogus. Inserting nonsense into Wikipedia is considered vandalism; if you continue you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia does not accept joke edits; you may find Uncyclopedia more to your taste. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Voldemort[edit]

Hey Skrooball, thanks for the friendly reminders on my talk page that there's a new message on the Lord Voldemort page. I have watchlisted that page, so it appears in my watchlist every time an edit is made to the page -- thus I will see that you've responded and check out what you've written. So, your alerts on my talk page are probably only necessary if it seems to have been a while since you've posted and I haven't said anything, in which case I must have missed it. Thanks anyway though! --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, thanks a lot for the "magnificent", but I don't want to sound conceited. :) There are barnstars for rewards and other things of that nature, though! --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 15:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is going off the track of Lord Voldemort now, I decided I'd bring it here to your talk page. The answer is no, I'm not a registered user at IMDb, but from what I can tell it's pretty easy to register. If you don't have an email, go to a free webmail provider, like yahoo.com, and register for free there. That's the best thing I can tell you. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 17:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS… thanks for the barnstar. It's my first one. :)

--Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 17:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're welcome, Fbv65edel! I enjoy brightening your day! But, about the e-mail: I have a Cox service provider, but I don't really know how to use it. It's just that I want that discussion so much! It'd be nice to see if anyone would support Coulson's return to the role (besides me, of course). Thanks for your replies! Cheerio! George "Skrooball" Reeves 19:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unfairly Blocked[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 72.200.147.16 lifted. Sorry for the trouble!

Request handled by: Luna Santin 03:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"m" means a minor edit[edit]

The Albus Dumbledore picture that you had replaced was agreed upon in the discussion page for various reasons listed there, please do not change it again. If you have a problem with the current picture please write an argument stating why you think it should be changed there. You should also only check "m" if your change is something small, like grammar or spelling. A good rule to follow is to ask your self "will my edit annoy anyone?"--Phnx2ashes 02:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greyface[edit]

I really don't know what you think you're doing with all that Grayface stuff you've been pulling, but knock it off. --Gwern (contribs) 05:18 24 November 2006 (GMT)

King Scorpion.[edit]

Scorpion's name is not established with certainty. It was written idiogramically, which doesn't mean that it is necesarrily srqt. Now, your arrangement of Scorpion chronologically with other pharaohs is also questionable. Please introduce questionable data with citations of where it comes from and who thinks it in the main article space. The infobox is for the established mainstream position only, however. Your help is always invited, however please don't make huge changes without data to back it up, and don't change from one name to another without at least warning us so we can be sure. It's going to be very difficult to restore the old versions now. Thanatosimii 00:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, we just need to stick to the established reconstruction of history. Thanatosimii 00:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I saw it on the Egyptian chronology page, and acted accordingly. My mistake. George "Skrooball" Reeves 00:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is a redirect now. Thanatosimii 15:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I think there is some confusion about what is to be a redirect to what. Look, we can't even prove that the scorpion symbol is vocalized as srqt, and therefore the established name is King Scorpion. We need to use the mainstream. Thanatosimii 04:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Science[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. dave souza, talk 09:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to New Testament apocrypha, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Cat Whisperer 07:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belated response re your contribution Yahya the Infinite[edit]

Hi George,

Thank you for adding your humour to Wikipedia, but the articles are meant to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to John the Baptist. [1] Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Fayenatic london 08:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox-191 Maryland Campaign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (Talk) 01:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Psycho (1960 film) GAR notification[edit]

Psycho (1960 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]