User talk:Simplyred90
Revert on "European Union"[edit]
Hi Simplyred90, I noticed you reverted my revision on European Union (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Union&diff=prev&oldid=1151472548). After reviewing it, I agree I was probably a bit fast in removing the statement! Thanks for noticing :). Now, I am not an expert, but I still think "only states with power projection capabilities" is probably a bit too much of a blanket statement, considering that e. g. Germany has >3,000 personel stationed abroad (according to article "power projection"). How would you feel about replacing the statement by the more specific "France and Italy are the only states in the EU with a blue-water navy"? --Paul Hege (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Germany has no navy.Germany has also a weaker army than France and Italy.Germany has also a weaker air force.I can agree.Simplyred90 (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your input. I didn't realize it, but it appears the armies of France and Italy are really quite a bit stronger than those of other EU states (like Poland and Spain), not only in terms of the navy but also in other dimensions, as shown for example the "Global Firepower Index" (although a bit of a dubious resource certainly). Thanks for the clarification! --Paul Hege (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Simplyred90! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! paul2520 💬 21:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
July 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Italy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 08:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Italy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 08:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Try to collaborate. Simplyred90 (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
You could collaborate by explaining precisely each deletion - 'article too long' is not a reason. Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The presentation of italy is too long. There are many useless points in presentation.Simplyred90 (talk) 09:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
'Useless points' are your opinion. You should get a consensus before removing. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Democracy is wonderful but here it's impossible. Try to help me in cutting.Thanks.Simplyred90 (talk) 09:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
We are waiting for Nikkimaria answer.Simplyred90 (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SpaceEconomist192 ✐ 18:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
You are editing not true things.Simplyred90 (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)