User talk:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disclosures[edit]

Welcome!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Welcome![edit]

Hello, See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bilby (talk) 07:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bilby, I am glad to see your response on my article. Really detailed, timely, informative, and much needed. I am considering redrafting this article while keeping an eye on the raised concerns. I will reach out should I need help. Thank you. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d. As per the request from Bilby, do you have any COIs to disclose? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, MrsSnoozyTurtle. Yes, I do have some COIs that I think should be disclosed. Nevertheless, I believe they did not impede me from writing this article as impartially as it should. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying, please see WP:COIEDIT. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, MrsSnoozyTurtle and will consider this in my future submissions. Again, thank you for the heads-up. I'm sorry about any inconveniences I may have caused by not disclosing ahead of time. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In moving forward, just note that you need to fully disclose your employer and the articles that you have been employed to work on. Instructions on how to do that are availabe here. - Bilby (talk) 00:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bibly. I appreciate your input and will be careful to disclose in future. Just to mention that it was my idea, and I always prefer to go with the truth because I believe it is easier to defend the truth, but whoever I consulted was vehemently against, and I thought it was not the best position to take. Nevertheless, I had informed them that it's the best practice and that in one way or the other, I'd disclose. On this, I will be sure to do just what I know policies say rather relying on someone's views. Thank you, again. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nomination of Amsterdam Stories USA for deletion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nomination of Amsterdam Stories USA for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amsterdam Stories USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amsterdam Stories USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comma copy-edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Comma copy-edit[edit]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. For example, see MOS:GEOCOMMA. Thank you. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 06:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I'm sorry if I went against any guidelines. Thank you for the heads up, I'll be careful. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 06:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quark Baby (August 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:
Reads as promotional and was likely written by one of the founders as it has details that dont make sense for the public to know
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLI 06:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLI 06:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AfC notification: Draft:Quark Baby has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quark Baby. Thanks! -- NotCharizard 🗨 07:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the comment, @Notcharizard. I'm looking into this right away. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quark Baby (August 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The Germans have a distinct word for drafts like this: Quark. Not only does the text read like an advertisement, it also relies on sources that are not suited for Wikipedia. References 1,2,5,9,10,13,14,16 are obvious press releases/editorials/sponsored media.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quark Baby (August 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements (it would be helpful if you could please identify, with specificity, which criteria you believe the draft meets?) then resubmit the page and leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 00:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Rob Rombout moved to draftspace

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rob Rombout moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Rob Rombout. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because paid articles need to go through AFC.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bilby (talk) 10:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Citation error alert

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

CS1 error on Leah Marangu[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Leah Marangu, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quark Baby (September 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Declined. Reviewers, please see further detailed discussion with the author on my Talk page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 23:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AfC Comments for Draft:Rob Rombout

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob Rombout (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough significant, independent coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 10:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2023 Elections

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
AfC Comments for Draft:Quark Baby

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Concern regarding Draft:Quark Baby[edit]

Information icon Hello, See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quark Baby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
NRG radio moved to draftspace

NRG radio moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to NRG radio. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 20:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for letting me know. I published it by mistake. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 03:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians in Ngong Hills

Category:Wikipedians in Ngong Hills[edit]

Category:Wikipedians in Ngong Hills has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_5#Category:Wikipedians_in_Ngong_Hills. – Fayenatic London 10:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Will check. Thank you. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
April 2024

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

April 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bird Paradise, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm working on it right now. Will be redoing and adding citations as fit. I'm sorry for the confusion I caused. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: I effectively made the needed changes by providing adequate citation to my contribution(s).See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 10:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
WikiProjects

WikiProjects[edit]

Wikiproject categories, such as Category:WikiProject Kenya, go on the talk page, not on the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note...

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d. Thank you for your work on Magistrates' Court (Kenya). Another editor, SafariScribe, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Kudos for your contributions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon

Hello See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to KETOS, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 04:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the detailed message. I have always disclosed my COIs. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind clarifying whether you promote your paid editing services outside of Wikipedia? GSS 💬 05:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not offer "paid editing services" and as such, I do not promote the same. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a disclosure on your User page which is required by Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Please read this section over. Liz Read! Talk! 06:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Liz. Thanks for your input. Please check again and advise. It's the first thing on this talk page. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d, in that case, may I know how you are being hired or paid? Or are you not being paid at all? GSS 💬 08:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Hired";"paid"? That's not the best way I'd describe this. I connect with subjects or representatives of subjects when I reach out to them via any available means to solicit for information that may lead to the best encyclopedic coverage of the topic. In any case, my aim is not to be paid but in the process, most people feel the need to even just make a compensation for resources spent. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is incorrect. It is apparant that you have been doing work through Upwork or related sites. What GSS is refering to is any site where you advertise your services, which includes your profile where you would offer your services at sites such as Upwork, Freelancer and Fivver. The details of the policy are at: Disclosing external accounts on Wikipedia. - Bilby (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When it's Bilby, I am not surprised. Bilby has never had anything positive to say about my contributions. Always reverting, and undoing, and tagging, and deleting, and accusing, and the list goes on... See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 02:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you do get work through any of these sites, you need to disclose each and every client on your userpage separately using the {{paid}} template and must not create articles directly in the main namespace. Additionally, in such cases you are required to provide a link to your profile(s) where you advertise paid editing services. GSS 💬 14:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's interesting the way you guys discuss and your general modus operandi. Why is it that you try your best to sway the discussion towards your side even when you think it'd be best to consider all possibilities? Why would you say "If you do get work through any...you need to...", well, and what if I do not?
Or make me understand, do you guys just assume bad faith by defailt? See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GSS, I do not understand why you've chosen to dratify my work while tagging it a violation of WP:PAID. I must mention like I did before that I have always disclosed my COIs. Can you please tell me which clause of WP:PAID I violated given that I had (as required) disclosed my COIs on the article's mainpage, it's talk page, and listed the same in my talk page. I have technically followed all the requirements of the very guidelines you're saying I violated. Please explain to me why this is happening. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 10:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Have reviewed the case. Long term promotional editing and refusal to disclose who is paying them and what group they are a part of despite this being clearly explained this is required. Extensive copyright violations on Commons related to that promotion.[1] Despite multiple warnings this has continued.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know why I was blocked. I have read and understood the WMF Terms of Use and I understand that my previous actions were going against the Terms. I will abide by the Terms in my future edits and will be careful to disclose all my COIs if any, including who's paying, on behalf of who. In terms of the Commons violation, I'm sorry I just hadn't understood what to do. I promise to do better. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk)

Decline reason:

It's difficult to trust you right now, so I'm not sure you will be unblocked to, in the short term, further edit about clients. You also don't say anything about complying with the requirement to disclose your external accounts where you offer your services. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know why I was blocked (promotion and advertising on Wikipedia). At the time of doing so, I was not aware that I was violating WMF'sTerms of Use. I have familiarized myself with the various Terms and promise not to violate them again. Additionally, I'll be sure to disclose all the necessary disclosures should I have a COI in editing including the client, the employer, and any and all affiliations involved as need be. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per 331dot, I see no path forward allowing you to continue writing about clients, at least not in the near term. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Impressive, Yamla. Very very impressive. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d&oldid=1222570465"