User talk:Sebastianbourges

Hello, Sebastianbourges. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Leticia Cáceres, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 07:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sebastianbourges, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as DirectorLC (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why this? - Please remove!

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sebastianbourges, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Melcous (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sebastianbourges. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sebastianbourges (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User Melcous has request me to be blocked me for unfair reasons. He claims I have personal interest in the page I'm editing due to close proximity with the subject. This is a very grey area as I am only volunteering to maintain Leticia Caceres wikipedia page, a page I did not originally started but I decided to maintain to help this talented and public Australian figure be part of the encyclopedia who host pages for similar figures, many of them colleagues of her. I'm new as editor and I and finding extremely difficult to navigate thought the complex rules of wikipedia, however, I have done all changes requested until user Malicous started what is seems a personal cyber bullying agains me. I have added all links and follow the guidelines in the best possible way. I believe it is unfair to block me out of as contributor

This is my justifications to all his claims:

1- Leticia Caceres is a public Australian figure. I added an overwhelming evidence of cites and links that prove who she is. On top, she is has a collection of more than 15 awards that are publicly shown all over the web. Google can prove this. 2- The only link that is added on the page that seems to be agains the rules, it LeticiaCaceres.com, which in many other pages of public figures can be found as well. If this is the problem, it can be easily removed. 3- I have done my bet to comply but the reasons for expressed by user Melcous are not clear, rather simple links to very extensive guidelines with information that I find impossible to relate. I rather prefer the user would take the effort to indicate more carefully or in details where the problem is. After several request from my side, he mention finally that I needed to add links to the Awards list. I was block already when I intended to solve this particular point.

I hope you take my consideration and unblock me so I can continue contributing to this noble project.

Thank you very much.

Sebastian Bourges (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your abuse of multiple accounts. Also personal attacks will not get you unblocked. MER-C 10:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.