User talk:Ronanmurphy98

Welcome!

Hello, Ronanmurphy98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Semi-confederate, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gaijin42 (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Semi-confederate[edit]

The article Semi-confederate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable term, no references, no google hits, article admits there are no examples. Not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Semi-confederate[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Semi-confederate, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 05:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Semi-confederation[edit]

A tag has been placed on Semi-confederation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is original research (WP:OR)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Major because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PamD 17:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Major. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PamD 14:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Zymurgy. An edit that you recently made to Dublin seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Zymurgy (talk) 22:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ignore that - I think the glitch was on my side, you seem to have been removing vandalism. ApologiesZymurgy (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Fine Gael without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Next Irish general election" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Irish general election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Irish general election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.
SSSB (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]