User talk:Robbieranger

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Robbieranger! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

October 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive page moves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Giant Snowman 07:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC) Huh? What for?[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I don't know why I have been blocked, I am new to wikipedia, if I have made a mistake please let me know Robbieranger (talk) 9:15 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

You see the message directly above, where it says you were blocked for disruptive page moves? You know the pages you've been moving, despite being told on more than one occasion to stop? Yeah. That. Unblock request denied because it fails to address (or, for that matter, even recognise) reason for block. Yunshui 雲‍水 20:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I did move a couple of pages. One for St James' Park to the correct name, however I have since took that to it's talk page to discuss it so that everyones happy. And I moved the Total Nonstop Action wrestling name to Total Nonstop Action wrestling (TNA) as i thought this would be better to have the initials used in the company in the name. However I got warned for that and now understand that that is not a better name to use. Then hours later after that warning I got banned and I don't know why. Robbieranger (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You know perfectly well why you were blocked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You moved St James' Park against consensus, despite the fact that said consensus is readily visible on the article's talkpage. You then proceeded to move Brazil national football team, New York Red Bulls and Liberty Professionals F.C. to new titles which were contrary to the Manual of style and had not been discussed. GiantSnowman notified you at that point that your conduct was disruptive, and warned you that he would take action if you continued. Your response was to accuse him of corruption before blanking the warnings from your talkpage and then moving yet another page to an inappropriate title. GiantSnowman then followed through on his warning and blocked you. Are you now clear on why you were blocked? Yunshui 雲‍水 21:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I do understand that a couple of the moves were unconstructive, however I took the warnings on board and made no more edits after the warning and got blocked. That I don't understand and thats why I think GiantSnowman has just done it for the sake of doing.

You have moved an article (without consensus and against the naming conventions about two days and a half after you were warned. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it is the Total Nonstop Action wrestling article, yes I did move that but only to add the frequently used initials (TNA) as I was confident this would be a constructive move. However I got told that it was better with just Total Nonstop Action Wrestling and not Total Nonstop action wrestling (TNA). So I then left the article alone as I was happy with this and was seen as a goodwill edit. In future I will make sure to discuss any changes I feel are worth making with other users on the article talk page before making any edits to avoid something like this happening again as I would like Wikipedia to be a friendly environment for all users. Robbieranger (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read my above comment, Thanks :) Robbieranger (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If this were an indefinite-length block, I would ask if you'd agree to refrain from performing any page moves yourself for a period of six months, and instead go through the WP:RM process for any move you feel is necessary. However, this block is only 48 hours, pretty short as they go. I suggest you take a break, enjoy your weekend, come back Monday all freshly unblocked, and be aware that if you continue the behavior that led to your block, you may be facing an indef block next. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BadSynergy (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Please refrain from moving the page until a source is provide although this is the likely new name for the stadium nothing has been annouced and there certainly no sources confirming plan to rename it to that only that there considering it Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 22:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the article Celtic F. C.. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Septic F.C[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Septic F.C, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 05:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned for page move issues before, so page move-related vandalism is, quite frankly, stupid. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unblock appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry it won't happen again Robbieranger (talk) 06:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. An optimist on the run! 07:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, and I'm very willing to make useful contributions to Wikepedia. This will not happen again. Thanks.Robbieranger (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You said so each time you were blocked. Why should we believe you? So far, it looks like you lack the maturity required to edit here. Max Semenik (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i very much doubt you will be unbanned, you have done things bordering on vandalism before and have a clear biased, but what you done yesterday means your unlikely to get unbanned because it will be a big risk, the only way a admin would unblock you is if you where chaperoned and limited to what you can edit ie a topic ban on anything related to the old firm. If you do come back i hope you respect wikipedia for what it is and not a tool for you to have fun with :(Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 16:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its coming

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. I've removed your talk page access. Kuru (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.