User talk:RayaruB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RayaruB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes at some point, here is what Wikipedia is not, which might help you out. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing! -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 05:02, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

suggested category[edit]

the 'Wikipedians by alma mater: Cornell University' might be something you want to put on your user page, just snag the text from mine. Cornell Rockey 02:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

His books are published by Aries Rising Press: from their websiote, Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles. was founded in 1984 by Alan Cantwell, M.D., for the purpose of disseminating vital medical research and knowledge concerning the origin and cause of two major diseases; Cancer and AIDS - it is his own imprint, the books are self-published. Just zis Guy you know? 14:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Super Bowl XLV
IDVD
Lakshya
IWeb
Stripping fetishism - lol, I can't believe there's even an article on this one... --RayaruB 20:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Babul
Tom Arnold (actor)
Monk (Dungeons & Dragons)
Betty La Fea
Black Hills Run
Soundtrack Pro
Shake (software)
Mask fetishism
Final Cut Express
Aperture (software)
Battle of Adrianople (1365)
Decisive Battles (TV series)
Krrish
Sam Egan
Cleanup
Beth Landau
Ted Hendricks
Redbud Woods - good pick! --RayaruB 20:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge
Pannonica
Absolute Boyfriend
Bhikkhu
Add Sources
Call of Duty 2
Super Bowl XXXII
Joanne Lees
Wikify
Set screw
Jinpyo
The Passengers (rock band from Belgium)
Expand
Second Noah (TV series)
William of Norwich
Sarah Schulman

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Came to Dinner[edit]

Harpo Marx did not appear with Wollcott in his tour of TMWCTD...He DID, however, appear in a very special presentation of the play in 1941 at the Bucks County Playhouse in Pennsylvania. This was a special one week run of the play that starred co-authors George S Kaufman as Shreridan Whiteside, and Moss Hart as "Beverly Carlton" a.k.a Noel Coward. This presentation was special for one reason: Harpo broke his so-called 'vow of silence' for this week only, apparently doing the 'Banjo' part lines and all! (This is according to the book, MONKEY BUSINESS: THE LIVES AND LEGENDS OF THE MARX BROS by Simon Louvish)

cheers!

Cornell[edit]

I have just started WikiProject Cornell University, an attempt to thoroughly cover topics related to Cornell. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Thanks! —mercuryboardtalk 05:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:History rhodes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:History rhodes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sheldon silver.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sheldon silver.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 02:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monk firehouse cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Monk firehouse cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Freedomcall.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Freedomcall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it still need more sources? I'm working on finding more information, but it sure is hard.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Star Trek[edit]

Hello, RayaruB, this message is being sent to inform you that, due to over two years editing inactivity, your username has been taken off of the list of Wikipedia Project Star Trek active conributers. If you have returned to active editing Wikipedia, please re add your name to the list of active contributers. Thank you, -- Alpha Quadrant (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This episode of Monk (TV series) fails to met the GNG or the interpretation of it given in FICTION. TV plot articles like this also fail to meet the specific definition of WP:IINFO#1.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mr. Monk and the Astronaut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This episode of Monk (TV series) fails to met the GNG or the interpretation of it given in FICTION. TV plot articles like this also fail to meet the specific definition of WP:IINFO#1.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Monk and the Astronaut for deletion[edit]

A user has requested discussion about whether the article Mr. Monk and the Astronaut is within Wikipedia's criteria for articles or whether it should be deleted. You are being notified since you created or contributed to this topic.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk and the Astronaut until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the criteria which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. You are encouraged to add useful evidence as well.

While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy. You may edit the article during the discussion, including improvements to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, you must not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist for deletion[edit]

The article Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note you uploaded this media, would you mind expanding the fair use rationale so it addresses ALL 10 points of WP:NFCC?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!