User talk:RFZYNSPY

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New message from Doug Weller[edit]

Hello, RFZYNSPY. You have new messages at Doug Weller's talk page.
Message added 19:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Doug Weller talk 19:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021[edit]

Regarding the January 6th Domestic Terrorist attack.[edit]

Those who took part in and committed an act of domestic terror are domestic terrorist. It is a simple label that helps inform those about those who attacked the United States Capitol. RandomOldGuyHistorian (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RandomOldGuyHistorian listen, I agree with you. Personally I consider those people terrorists and insurrectionists. But replacing the word "rioter" with "domestic terrorist" throughout the entire article is a controversial edit that should be discussed on the talk page of the article before being implemented. You should go to that link and make a case for why the article should use the term "domestic terrorist" complete with multiple reputable sources which widely use the term. When you post there feel free to tag me by writing {{u|RFZYNSPY}} somewhere in your edit on the talk page. Lastly, please make sure you're aware of the three revert rule so you don't get barred from editing the article. Also take a look at the process of BOLD, revert, discuss which applies to what's going on here. RFZYNSPY talk 22:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why calling a domestic terrorist a domestic terrorist is controversial when they used terrorism to try and overturn an election.

I will continue to try and edit this to be truthful. I don't think I need to refer to any news article as what everyone witnessed that day was the very definition of terrorism.

Instead of hindering me, help me out. I am new to this but I feel like my passion for truth is diminishing because of this back and forth. RandomOldGuyHistorian (talk) 22:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RandomOldGuyHistorian I am trying to help you out. Your best bet to get your changes implemented and not get banned from editing for 24 hours is to generate a discussion on the article's talk page. If you need any help with the logistics of doing that let me know. Be warned that you continuing to make bold edits that have been reverted because of issues with WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and lack of adequate citations is going to diminish your "passion for truth" much more than simple discussing the edit on the talk page, because continuing to make those edits directly without consensus might get you banned from editing. And nobody here wants that! Least of all me. RFZYNSPY talk 22:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. You can go back to editing factual statements so you don't end up looking controversial.

Nice sarcasm with the quotes by the way.

Thanks. RandomOldGuyHistorian (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cool User page and badges etc. Here's the PyRx link with video about it[edit]

Nice meeting you @RFZYNSPY: earlier at the Balboa Park event / meet--up / outreach. (1) Here's that link to the PyRx installer and project website with neat video of what it does. I guess he used to have a free version. (My favorite part is they show going to FreeChem or whatever and downloading molecule binaries that one can then spin and interact in 3D!) ; (2) Also, want to play chess again sometime, either in chess dot com app and or IRL? Peace! -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 05:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Likewise, Vid2vid! Thanks for sharing that tool with me. Hopefully sometime soon I'll be educated enough to make use of it. I'd like to play chess with you as well. I spend a good amount of time in my lectures playing chess on my phone because some professors are incredibly boring to listen to. If you send me an email through Wikipedia I can share my Chessdotcom username with you. Again, great meeting you both! RFZYNSPY talk 06:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi RFZYNSPY. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Cookie of Thanks[edit]

I was just looking around for how people have formatted the Wikipedia Adventure badges, and I really liked how you made it into a collapsible display. I wanted to thank you, so here's a cookie! Born of Iron (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2021[edit]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021[edit]

As I explained in the edit summary, the sources are found in the linked article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8803:7C8C:FB00:F5C8:1F65:74B6:CE1A (talk) 04:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2600:8803:7C8C:FB00:F5C8:1F65:74B6:CE1A, thank you for letting me know. Wikipedia as a rule of thumb requires sources per claim per article. That means that if you find a source in one article, you are encouraged to take that reference and add that to any claims made in separate articles. Since Conservative Democrat is a separate article, that's what I would recommend. Just take the original source that supports the claim made in Murphy J. Foster and add it in after your new claim in Conservative Democrat. If you have any issues doing this let me know and I can take a shot at it for you. RFZYNSPY talk 05:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 December 2021[edit]

CVUA Withdrawal[edit]

Hi @Cassiopeia:, I wanted to let you know I'm no longer interested in continuing the CVU Academy. Thank you for the time and effort you put into helping me, but I am no longer able to keep up with the course. Again, thank you. Best, RFZYNSPY talk 05:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Hi RFZYNSPY, Good day. Thank you for informing me regarding the above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Bennett Sr. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Bennett Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bennett Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92Talk 14:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 24 April 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 26 June 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 31 August 2022[edit]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Phospholipids aqueous solution structures.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022[edit]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022[edit]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 4 February 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 8 May 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 22 May 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 5 June 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023[edit]

Thank you for attending[edit]

Edit-a-thon acknowledgement
Thank you for attending an edit-a-thon at the San Diego Central Library. Hope to continue to see you at future events. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 15:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023[edit]

DYK for Chollas Creek[edit]

On 11 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chollas Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a California sea lion, later named Freeway, was thought to have traveled up Chollas Creek (pictured) before getting onto California State Highway 94? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chollas Creek. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chollas Creek), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023[edit]

Concern regarding Draft:Petrobactin[edit]

Information icon Hello, RFZYNSPY. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Petrobactin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023[edit]

I was in the middle of creating Draft:2-Bromopentane and found your draft article. I think it's good! Which makes me a little concerned that it's still a draft. I don't think I should publish someone else's draft, so I recommend you do so before it gets auto-deleted. Reconrabbit (talk|edits) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reconrabbit, I just made some edits to it and submitted it for review. Thank you for bringing the draft to my attention! Best, RFZYNSPY talk 05:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2-Decanone has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2-Decanone. Thanks! Naraht (talk) 18:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2-Decanone has been accepted[edit]

2-Decanone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024[edit]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024[edit]

Concern regarding Draft:Enloplatin[edit]

Information icon Hello, RFZYNSPY. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enloplatin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024[edit]

Your draft article, Draft:Enloplatin[edit]

Hello, RFZYNSPY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Enloplatin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024[edit]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, RFZYNSPY. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Botulism immune globulin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]