User talk:Quaber

Welcome!

Hello, Quaber, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as WAREZ-BB, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJaguar3 | u | t 18:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WAREZ-BB[edit]

The article WAREZ-BB has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent reliable sources with nontrivial coverage have been provided to demonstrate notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WAREZ-BB for deletion[edit]

The article WAREZ-BB is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAREZ-BB until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation of Vito Roberto Palazzolo[edit]

You commented on my efforts to get redress for Palazzolo, in February (see below).

Recently, after seeing the vandalism that user fircks has done on this article for almost 2 years, I reported him and his vandalism to almost every noticeboard and any other possible location on wikipedia. Because of that, this article became protected and user fircks was warned mutliple times and asked to stop editing this article. Then this happened [1]. Just stop it fircks. I think he should be banned from editing this article already. Quaber (talk) 09:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

What I would like to know is how and where can I get an editor, or editors, to consider Palazzolo's issue. He IS being maligned by Don Calo at Wikipedia but whenever I start a thread, in his defence, it disappears. What can I do about this?

There was a court case in South Africa concerning The Sunday Independent with (inter allia) wikipedia. I think it's important that Palazzolo gets a fair hearing. Can you help?

Fircks (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Hello. Please take care to use edit summaries properly. While the edit was in good faith, your summary here [1] was unnecessarily rude and dismissive to other contributors. We want to maintain productive cooperation between editors and civil, courteous conduct toward each other is an important part of that. Thanks. --Anentiresleeve (talk) 20:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]