User talk:ProfGrunt

Your edits

Please do not remove factual material from the National Defense Service Medal article. I edited out the "nicknames" section, but the time limit and precedence material is completely accurate from U.S. military regs and service record entries. Thank you -OberRanks 15:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

OberRanks, You screw with my edits, I'll screw with yours. Life is pretty fair like that. Lima Charlie?

I see you're back on the article. I would seriously suggest you review this website's policies. Right now, you're bordering on breaking WP:NPV. The comment above, although two years ago, also clearly violates WP:CIV and possibly WP:NPA. You won't get very far here with those kinds of attitudes. Its far better to work with rather than against other editors. -OberRanks (talk) 04:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I wish I could sit on wiki all day long too! LMAO.

June 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. JNW (talk) 03:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll do as I please, what are you going to do about it, whimp.

Now, come on, if I acted that way with you, you'd be inclined to lace up your ass-kicking shoes, right? How can you expect anyone to not seek to have you bounced out of Wikipedia at the very first time you fuck up? And, since you are new, the chances of you making a blockable mistake are huge. Think more long-term, please

There is a better way to approach these sorts of matters, ProfGrunt, but all of it starts with you learning how to edit, and how to take constructive criticism. Your addition wasn't acceptable.

If you want help in learning how to edit here, ask me. I may not know every damn thing, but I know how to find the answers. 'Course, if you don't want the help, that's fine, too. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 03:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I know, Sorry for the angry post. You are right, you know. Thanks for calling me out on that.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Infantry, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (Hohum ^@) 18:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Bart Stupak

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Wgfinley (talk) 08:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I will do as I please.

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Thomas E. Donilon, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diannaa ^(Talk) 01:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh thank you, but it's true, he's not a veteran and is another rich guy without any idea about what combat troops do. And no denying it./ But common sense isn't citeable these days when politics gets involved and clouds judgement!~  :) :) :)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Talk:Contessa Brewer, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Patti LaBelle. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 02:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)