User talk:Phillip J

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive

Archive

1 2 3

Thanks[edit]

I've been particularly enjoying your article 19th Century Protestant Missions in China. It's been a long time since I've seen material on the TaiPing revolution and I hadn't been aware that more recent scholars underline the religious aspect of it (I'd seen the older stuff that it was primarily political). Thanks so much for your work here.

Greetings from Belgium,

James Coder http://www.codific.com

China[edit]

Hello, Phillip J,

You might be interested in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Christianity in China work group. Just a friendly invite so that more folks could get involved. Thanks.Brian0324 (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phillip J, are you a member of TJC by any chance? It's crucial that there is no conflict of interest in the editing of related articles.

Additionally, if there are any factual statements you'd like to make, please cite them accordingly. If there are any statements that you believe to be incorrect, by all means replace them and use the appropriate citation for information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulWei (talk • contribs) 08:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Hey Phillip - I noticed in your reversion here that you've been calling this IP's edits vandalism. You're not a newbie, I'm not going to template you, but you need to know that NPOV violations and tendentious editing aren't considered vandalism. Please see WP:NOTVAND. It seems to me the IP does want to "improve" the article; they're attempting to use sources, and from their point of view, they probably think they're helping the article. What they may not know is that their own POV clouds their judgment. My advice would be instead of wholesale reverting, try and implement any parts that would improve the article (e.g. an additional ref) and delete the parts that hurt the article (e.g. the IP replacing "believes" with "claims that", adding "cult" to the lede, etc). I know the IP is being tendentious and POV-ish, but from roots like this good editors can be molded now and again. Let's encourage them to abide by the rules and participate in the community - just my 2 cents.

-- Joren (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Pentecostlism[edit]

Hey! I was reading the Pentecostalism in China article, and I noticed that the citation style seemed unclear. Unless I'm mistaken much of the article has been written by you, and I'd thought I'd ask if you were able to, to possibly add the titles of the works you cited? It's just that it's hard for some to do follow up research with only a last name and a publication date. Happy editing. Ltwin (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot. Ltwin (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edin Cornelius Alfsen[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Edin Cornelius Alfsen, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ricci.rt.usfca.edu/biography/view.aspx?biographyID=1574.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was directly translated from the Norwegian Wikipedia article. Phillip J (talk) 08:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Pentecostal Foreign Mission of Norway[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Pentecostal Foreign Mission of Norway, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.byhisgrace.cc/extremadura/id327.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:43, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was directly translated from the Norwegian Wikipedia article. --Phillip J (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please unlink years[edit]

See WP:UNLINKDATES. Geschichte (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --Phillip J (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translations[edit]

When you translate articles from foreign language Wikipedias, please remember to attribute them appropriately (such as by using {{Translated page}}) as indicated at Wikipedia:Translation and Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I will be a responsible contributor. --Phillip J (talk) 08:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Phillip, given the serious problems with copyright flagged in your articles, I'm afraid I've had to remove this permission from your account. Should you wish to receive it again, please just spend some time learning our approach to copyright and plagiarism. After enough time has passed during which your content has no issues with these, I'm sure that the permission can be restored. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gjertrud Fitje for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gjertrud Fitje is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gjertrud Fitje until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

The nomination was made 6 days ago, so you want to hurry if you want to have your opinion considered before a decision is reached. __meco (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Christ in China[edit]

Hi Phillip. I noticed that you've copied the article Church of Christ in China almost entirely from the book, "Christianity in China: From the Eighteenth Century to the Present". I take it from the above messages that you should be aware that doing this is a copyright violation. If you've contributed any more articles to Wikipedia that you copied from a book, we need to know. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Protestant missions in China 1807–1953[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Protestant missions in China 1807–1953, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from The Church in Asia by Donald Hoke, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Protestant missions in China 1807–1953 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Christianity in Taiwan[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Christianity in Taiwan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from A History of Christianity in Asia: Volume II: 1500-1900 by Samuel H. Moffett, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Christianity in Taiwan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contributor copyright investigation (CCI)[edit]

So far, every article of yours that I've looked at has either been copied from a book or translated without proper attribution from another Wikipedia. While the latter can be repaired (see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia), the former cannot - not without rewriting or permission supplied by the copyright owner. Since we were alerted to this issue by the complaint of a copyright owner, it seems highly unlikely that permission will be available from the authors whose works you've copied.

You will not receive individual notices of actions taken to articles. Instead, if you would like to see where content has been addressed, please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Phillip J. At the end of the investigation, this page will be blanked in courtesy to you. However, that may be some time, as there is a backlog on these investigations.

If you know or suspect that you have copied content into any article not yet address, it would be very helpful if you could draw this to our attention so that we can attend to it as quickly as possible.

Please be very careful to follow copyright policies henceforth. You can review them briefly at Wikipedia:Copy-paste, but should spend some time familiarizing yourself with the actual policies on how to use copyright content (Wikipedia:Copyrights; Wikipedia:Non-free content). If you intend to try to rewrite this content yourself, I would also recommend reading through Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. If the content is not completely rewritten, we will not be able to retain it. We cannot use content that follows too closely on most other sources any more than we can use content copied from or directly translated from them.

If you have any questions about the CCI, or about copyright policies on Wikipedia, you are welcome to come by my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Wei.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Wei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Phillip J. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Annie Skau Berntsen.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Annie Skau Berntsen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chongqing Chinese Self-supporting Methodist Church[edit]

Notice

The article Chongqing Chinese Self-supporting Methodist Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-unsourced stub with empty sections.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilverStar54 (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phillip_J&oldid=1156241374"