User talk:OscarWongLara1999

1999 Honda Grand Prix of Monterey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1999 Honda Grand Prix of Monterey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JC7V (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1999 Honda Grand Prix of Monterey (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1999 Honda Grand Prix of Monterey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1999 Honda Grand Prix of Monterey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, OscarWongLara1999! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Northamerica1000 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami

Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add your references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami

The article 2000 Marlboro Grand Prix of Miami has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has never had any references, and has had a history of moving between draft space and article space. If sources are supplied within a week, it will be okay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Kits

No, the kits are original research and totally unsourced. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a gallery of kits. – PeeJay 21:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@PeeJay:. It seems nothing has changed. First an anon editor added kits to 2008–09 FC Bayern Munich season, 2010–11 FC Bayern Munich season, 2011–12 FC Bayern Munich season, 2017–18 FC Bayern Munich season, 2018–19 FC Bayern Munich season and 2019–20 FC Bayern Munich season. None were sourced, and I'm not sure how one would source such. Then this editor added a series of comments on my talk page asking me why "some kits" were erased and then vandalized and self-reverted my user page.

OscarWongLara1999: do you understand WP:V. Do you recognize that it is a pillar? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

@OscarWongLara1999: It's no skin off our nose if you quit Wikipedia. I couldn't care less if you stay or go. In fact, if you're going to add unsourced and unencyclopaedic content to these articles, I'd prefer it if you left. – PeeJay 12:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of Nike sponsorships

added links pointing to Fábio Silva, Aleksandr Golovin, Raúl García, Michael Keane, Djibril Sidibé, João Mário, André Silva and Callum Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nike sponsorships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reece James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nike sponsorships, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlos Gruezo and Ander Barrenetxea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nike sponsorships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nike sponsorships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Weir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:73.49.20.93. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SkyWarrior 17:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Or the ones made on my user page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stay off my user page

I have no idea why you're adding and deleting random sentences. Please stop.

Billmckern (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, OscarWongLara1999,

The next time you post silly messages on to other editor's user talk pages or you move user pages around, you will be blocked. Please edit productively and use user talk pages to communicate with other editors about Wikipedia matters. If you have questions about editing or user pages, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

I told you in September if you messed around with other editor's User pages, you'd be blocked. If you continue after your block is over, the next block will be for weeks or months, not hours. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sparkle1

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Sparkle1, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EDM fan 2 (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OscarWongLara1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'M Really sorry for vandalizing the users and sorry everyoneOscarWongLara1999 (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Continuing to edit with your sock puppet, User:OEWL24, doesn't engender good will from administrators. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm wondering why after what seems to be a decent edit history(in examining some of your edits at random) you decided to go off the rails and do what you did. What productive contributions do you wish to make, and why should we trust that you won't go off the rails again? 331dot (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)