User talk:Orchis29

Welcome!

Hello, Orchis29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Nightshadow28 (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for precaution on 3RR and others[edit]

You reverted 3 times on National Treasures of Japan so did I. I don't think you could mistake for yourself.

Your certain feeling is quite conspicuous as you are removing or minimizing Korean influences on Japanese culture, but you try to tag on the article of national treasures of South Korea with the category like Korean culture originating in Japan. The "creator" of the category is quite notable in Korean editors. You might know the editor well because you seem to be very knowledgeable of Wikipedia rules and category sorting already on contrast to your account creation log. Well, you were an anon or has some reason for that.

In addition, you don't change China with "Chinese continent" but you insist on using "Korean peninsula" instead of Korea. If you wanted to state the concept of National treasure, you can add that in the article with verifiable sources. AND the purpose of the "see also" section introduces relevant articles for readers. Please don't distort or delete cited "facts" by your "certain feeling" against Korea. --Appletrees (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Grave of the Fireflies, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You keep intentionally faking "facts" and distorting articles with your wrong translation from your anti Korean sentiment. Please refrain from doing disruptive behaviors.--Appletrees (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ryōtarō Shiba. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please don't lie any more with your hatred against Korea. The author wrote essays and novels on Korea like 耽羅紀行. If you happened not to know about the writer or his works, please at least try to search relevant information on the internet.--Appletrees (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, but...[edit]

Hello Orchis29. Welcome to Wikipedia. If you contribute to Liancourt Rocks, please read Talk:Liancourt Rocks#New rules of conduct. That article is under zero-tolerance of edit warring. And spirits of the rules will be useful for editing in other article. --Nightshadow28 (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Ryōtarō Shiba, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I see you hate Korea so much but distorting or fabricating information are considered nothing but vandalism. Please refrain from abusing Wikipeda. Regards.-Appletrees (talk) 13:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

編集合戦をやめてくれ[edit]

Japanese Nation Treasures での編集合戦はみっともないので辞めて下さい。また、韓国の国宝認定制度を、当時の日本政府が創ったという趣旨についてはWPのガイドラインに沿う「信憑性のある出典」を提示してくれれば相手の難癖をつける根拠が、少なくともこの「出典」の観点からはなくなります。（ここでの適切性、いわば「内容的な関連性」の問題点は残ると思いますが）いずれにしても編集合戦のほうはお辞め下さい。これは英語のWPなので潔く辞めることのほうは先方に恥をかかせることに見えて、Orchis29の勝ちと見做されることになると思います。むこうのほうが、続けることによって大人気なく見えるわけです。匆々Jim_Lockhart (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kofun period[edit]

The above article has now been fully protected due to the edit war in which you have been a participant. Although it is currently protected on the version you have been supporting, you should not view that as a victory or as a license to stop participating in the discussion. If I don't see constructive input from your side of the argument, I will allow the other side to make the changes they deem appropriate. If a solution can't be reached within four days, further steps may need to be taken to resolve the dispute. Kafziel ^{Ask me for rollback} 23:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am insisting that the explanation of the Chinese history book by a Korean user is unnecessary. They insist that the Chinese history book has the bias. However, Bais of Korea is included also as for their insistences. --Orchis29 (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V and WP:Incivility[edit]

Please don't insult me with the rude defamation. And why do you restore the reference which provides no information about Japanese manga's influence on Korean manhwa? Tell me what is your reason to call me like this?

Destruction by the Korean was restored. http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/lexicon.php?id=67

The citation fails to prove your claim. I will patch any admin to review this endless dispute. --Appletrees (talk) 16:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]