User talk:OneColumbia

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, OneColumbia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Columbia University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 13:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm especially concerned about Pebblefire's COI. In fact, we seem to have consensus on TC's status as an affiliate so there's no dispute here. What Pebblefire is objecting, however, is indicating as such on the list, because it's not "inclusive". But Wikipedia must be based on the facts, not our personal feelings.--OneColumbia (talk) 13:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not based on personal feelings. I've cited four different official university documentation that correctly corroborates the statements. It appears that OneColumbia does not wait for others to weigh in on the consensus, decides for himself that an edit must be made because of his own personal passions, and then continues to be a disruptive editor on the Columbia University pagePebblefire (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No COI warning for Pebblefire who has been literally editing Teachers College's article since April 2016, who is also accused of being a sockpuppet account by other users? Again, we have no dispute that TC is an affiliate (consistent with various documentation and the Columbia website) but Pebblefire wants such designation to be removed because it's not inclusive.--OneColumbia (talk) 16:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Columbia University, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but it seems that you haven't reviewed the context of the dispute. --OneColumbia (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "OneColumbia", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the name of a website. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]