User talk:OMPwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page.

OMPwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi OMPwiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classification Tree Editor (October 9)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classification Tree Method (October 9)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

  • I was able to check the referenced symposia articles. It was a little hard to put some of them together with the subject, and one of the ISBN's is wrong (duplicate of the another). It is also difficult to tell whether these sources should be considered independent, as all of them see to be developers and promoters of the methodology, not "qualified bystanders" who are discussing it. Nevertheless, 'll give it a "pass" and approve it. You will probably have more difficulty with the editor. Even though it is in common use for CTM practitioners, it isn't really separately notable. I suggest just merging its content in.Dovid (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(this is a duplicate of Dovid's talk-page) Hi, sorry for the confusion. I did two things:
* Added external references for the Method from Testing Books by different authors (that is, authors independent from the development of the method)
* Reviewed that duplicate ISBN thing to realize that - it is indeed correct, the two references with different article topics/titels are from the same book, a conference proceedings.
For the suggested merger CTM/CTE, I'll give the CTE article a second try with more external/independent references. If that again fails, I'll follow your advice as given above on merging.
→ AfC is again on review - OMPwiki (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Classification Tree Method was accepted[edit]

Classification Tree Method, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dovid (talk) 05:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Classification Tree Editor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Classification Tree Editor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Classification Tree Editor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OMPwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Classification Tree Editor".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ISO/IEC 29119, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Examples and Templates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]