User talk:NoSeptember/The NoSeptember Admin Project

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am not sure what the criteria is for inclusion in User:NoSeptember/The NoSeptember Admin Project#Subpages created by all users:, but you may be interested in:


I am quite liberal about what I include and welcome others to add their pages when they wish to. Anything about one's thoughts on adminship is welcome. The only pages that I exclude are those about things such as 1)a personal log of admin actions or 2)a page related to a specific admin/user dispute. NoSeptember 13:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Rate of new admins[edit]

That graph of admin seniority is interesting - I'd have expected the growth in new admins to keep accelerating, but it appears to be slowing down? Regards, Ben Aveling 09:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See the top graph at User:NoSeptember/admin graphs too. NoSeptember 09:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Interesting. Can you say what the ratio of admin actions to page edits looks like? Regards, Ben Aveling 09:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There appears to be some edit data on this page and admin action data here. I didn't put these graphs together, so I don't know the ultimate source of the data. If you want someone to compare the trends of those two items, ask at WT:RFA, there are several people who like to do that. NoSeptember 09:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I saw that. It suggests the ratio of edits to admins has maybe doubled. But there was another graph that suggested the number of admin actions per admin is also declining. I might take it to WT:RFA talk, but not now. I don't really feel like restarting 'that' discussion there, at the moment. Regards, Ben Aveling 09:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More admin stats[edit]

I've just been doing some work over at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nomination data/All RfA nominations, and I was wondering if you would be able to comment? I'm interested in bringing that table over there up to date, and keeping it up to date. Obviously avoiding overlap with what you do would be sensible. Any opinions? Carcharoth 18:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]