User talk:Neptuunium

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Neptuunium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Far-right politics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Far-right politics[edit]

Hi there.

Please let me explain why I reverted your change in a bit more detail as it is not easy to get a full explanation into an edit summary.

The picture shows a torchlit march, which is a stylistic tick of the far right (including but not exclusively including neo-Nazis).

The caption is:

Far-right nationalists on a rally in Tallinn, Estonia in 2015".

The two claims being made of the party/march are "far-right" and "nationalist". The party marching is clearly identified by the logos on the banners as the Conservative People's Party of Estonia. It is reasonable to ask if these descriptions are correct.

The article Conservative People's Party of Estonia says:

It has also been labelled "far-right" by Kari Käsper, the Executive Director of Estonian Human Rights Centre,[26] and in foreign media by BBC News[27] and the Christian Science Monitor.[28] According to Fox News Channel, EKRE is a far-right party, "considered by some to have Fascist-Neo-Nazi sympathies similar to many other flourishing nationalist parties in the Baltics and Eastern Europe".[29] The Simon Wiesenthal Center has called EKRE youth organization's annual torchlight procession an "extreme right march".[30]

That clearly supports the caption used. So long as the article is correct the image and the caption is justified.

So now I am asking ask you to please stop removing the image unless you can get a consensus to do so on either article's talk page.

I hope this is clear now. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Free party[edit]

The bias is in your thinking. Populism isn't bad or negative trait. Free Party is, by nature, a populist party. Having populism among the ideologies isn't biased any way. In fact most of the mainstream parties are populist. Having the most populist election promises by independent researchers of praxis is quite enough to have the populism among the ideologies. Freedom Party of Austria, Vlaams Blok, Progress Party (Denmark) etc have populism in the ideologies. By the way it is not nice to attack someone in the Edit summary. Behave yourself, and reverse your edit. Klõps (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By Klõps' logic... you say. Avoid indirect criticism, Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Klõps (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed content from J. R. R. Tolkien without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is no timeline to meet your requirements. The section is clearly tagged and readers are aware of the dispute. There is no need to censor what you object to simply because you don't like it. Feel free to add referenced counter-points to make the section more neutral, but gutting it is not appropriate. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get over it?[edit]

if that's not a personal attack, it's pretty close. See WP:NPA. Remember to discuss the content, not the contributors. And again, WP:CONSENSUS isn't two editors agreeing on something. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Neptuunium. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armin Laschet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annexation of Crimea. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]