User talk:Mordantkitten

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk

Image tagging for Image:Clydelewis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Clydelewis.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde Lewis has been nominated for deletion.[edit]

You probably want to express yourself at AfD/Clyde Lewis, given that you've put a fair amount of work into that article. —SlamDiego←T 01:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, and for the fixes you've done. Especially the 15/14-story-fall thing.  :) Mordant Kitten 08:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jargon[edit]

I think that you really meant to refer to sockpuppets, rather than to meatpuppets, in AfD/Clyde Lewis.

The term “sockpuppet” refers to a secondary account. Thus, sockpuppets are disallowed when used

  • to distort the apparent mass of opinion (as in discussions where voting or consensus is to determine an outcome,
  • to surreptitiously violate the three-revert rule, or
  • to surreptitiously violate a block or ban.

The term “meatpuppet” refers to a second person acting as a mere subordinate, rather than as an autonomous editor. (There seems to be a consensus that these too are a Bad Thing, but rules and quasi-rules against them end-up being arbitrary or utterly unenforceable.) —SlamDiego←T 20:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clydelewis.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clydelewis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Mordantkitten. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mordantkitten. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Clyde Lewis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We got maybe one newspaper article mentioning him--does not appear to pass GNG. Please see history for more "content".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 04:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clyde Lewis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clyde Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Lewis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]