User talk:Minikui

Welcome!

Hello, Minikui, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Shirahadasha 17:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam edit[edit]

Thanks for your note.

I don't know much about this source -- don't know the basis of its information or who it is -- so can't comment right now, although in general Wikipedia prefers publications that have some sort of peer review or journalistic/academic/scholarly standards and generally discourages private websites except for the opinions of notable individuals/organizations. (See WP:RS). Don't have time to look into this source right now. For the time being, why not cite the source in the article, identify whose opinion is being expressed, and perhaps simply say "may be" rather than "most probably is"? We can look into the source involved later. Best, --Shirahadasha 17:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maria[edit]

All Roman names had female form to denote female mambers of the family just as Julia is a female form of Julius.--Dojarca 20:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox for names[edit]

I see that you are editing pages about names. You might like to add an Infobox like the one that User:Hmwith has put on several pages like Zechariah. Just a suggestion! Keep up the good work, Fayenatic london (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rubel / Louvre in Claymore[edit]

Is that information properly sourced on the Japanese Wikipedia? If not, it's original research, and the anon editor was right in deleting it. We can't really use another Wikipedia as a reliable source for such statements - since anyone can edit it. --Darkbane ^talk 11:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Keep me posted =) I agree that it sounds very plausible, at least, it's just a problem with it being original research. On the other hand, the case for Orsay sounds more solid at the moment ^_^; But I thought there are b-sounds in Katakana. At least, our wiki page lists some. --Darkbane ^talk 12:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, I was confused there for a while ^_^;. There's still the problem of the official name. I don't have the Viz manga to check - do they also call him Rubel? --Darkbane ^talk 12:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's leave it at that for now. I think the article on Claymore characters has a lot more significant problems than this at the moment, seeing as how the bar for content is so low in anime articles. You're aware of the problem with OR and are taking some steps, that's all I wanted from this talk ^_^ and I'm also grateful for it. --Darkbane ^talk 13:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang in there, we need more people speaking Japanese doing research on these articles :D --Darkbane ^talk 17:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there are no "higher ups" around here. We're all equal editors as far as I understand it =). I don't doubt that it's not invented, it just might be difficult to prove it. But I think that, if you add that "connection" data for the other names that you found, it will lend more credibility to it and will not be challenged as easily.

I actually have a similar case in one of my "own" articles, for Cyrano de Bergerac. It's more painfully obvious, but it's somewhat similar to this case. So if the spelling is quite close, I guess it shouldn't be an issue of original research - since stating the blatantly obvious is not original research. --Darkbane ^talk 20:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wellber will probably not be famous enough for that list =) It's barely getting any attention right now, and I am probably one of the very few people who actually like it. Claymore, on the other hand, is sure to end up there eventually ^_^; --Darkbane ^talk 21:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rafaela's fighting style in Claymore[edit]

Can you say where you got the info from that Rafaela is offensive rather than defensive? I've not read the manga, but from what I know about her, she seems more likely to be defensive. PS4FA 00:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Isley head.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Isley head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ophelia profile.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ophelia profile.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Riful head.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Riful head.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rigardo awakened head.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rigardo awakened head.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flora head.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flora head.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Luciela head.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Luciela head.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ophelia awaken head.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ophelia awaken head.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Flora head.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flora head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Luciela head.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Luciela head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rigardo awakened head.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rigardo awakened head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Riful head.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Riful head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Haou Airen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 13:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Haou Airen. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Schnitzel MannGreek. 13:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]