User talk:Mhdsuhail111

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rajamanikyam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mhdsuhail111, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Mhdsuhail111!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure
This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 03:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Loham has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Loham was changed by Mhdsuhail111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940238 on 2015-09-29T17:56:20+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Utopiayile Rajavu, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist] I am sorry for the Routine editing in wikipedia please unblock me i will not edit anything wothout a reliable source Give me a last chance like you i also wish to be an editor in wikipedia So please unblock me

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When i was blocked i was just a starter in wikipedia i dont know about the rules and regulations. Now i understand the policies to be followed in wikipedia. I waited for a long period of time exact 2 yrs more to get unblock. But still i am blocked. Can you please say when will my block get removed Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 10:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hai I have been blocked in Wikipedia for almost 3 years. It was my error as I had made many changes in many sections without providing reliable sources. I understand because of my edit many will believe my error corrections. I started two or three accounts then but it too blocked I don't know that IP address may cause. Now onwards without any admins Co firm I won't change any sections in wiki. I will maximum provide the best information according to the reliable sources. I will provide the admins the information for the South Indian Movies Boxoffice collection and I won't change anything without admins confirmation. I also like to be a part in Wikipedia. It's almost 3 years I have been blocked. Admins please consider my requestMhdsuhail111 (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have to decline this unblock at present because you have downplayed your actions, implying that the issue was just a lack of good sourcing. That's not accurate. Many of your edits were straight-up vandalism. Like here where you deliberatly fabricated the financial data for Bhaskar the Rascal and then deleted half the article. Even if we assumed that was an accident, it doesn't explain why you did it again two days later, and a month after that at Loham. Also, the longest you've stayed away from Wikipedia as far as I can tell, is 7 months, not the 2 years you claimed in your previous block. So while I do not entirely object to unblocking people who may have matured over the span of three years, I'd like to get an honest explanation about why you made edits like that and I'd also like to know how you would be contributing positively in the future before I would consider endorsing an unblock. I also want to know in what areas you plan to edit, because you seem to have a history of messing around with Mammootty and Mohanlal film finances, which I don't think is terribly constructive, given not only how competitive these two and their fans are, but also because of the shoddy reporting of film figures between the two. I'd also like to know which of these other accounts you acknowledge using:

  • Mollywood.lover
  • Sagar.kottappuram777
  • Hackerwala111
  • Mathewav7
  • Bilalstephen
  • Aneezikka
  • Dolbycare123
  • Saheeralikt
  • Henshal Baby
  • Malayalammojo
  • Shworks999
  • Dabish me
  • Imus007
  • Saheeralikt

Please respond in the discussion area below and please do not open a new unblock request. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please list the other accounts you have used. 331dot (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would also add that the role of admins is not to approve the edits of others. You may discuss your edits with any other editor that is following the relevant article or who reverts one of your edits, or you may make edit requests that can be fulfilled by any editor. If you want guidance from another user, you can try to get a specific user to "adopt" you at the adopt a user project. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The other accounts I created where psychotraveler, mhdsuhail007, mhdsuhail30. This three where I created and I won't remember any other.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So there may be other accounts that you don't remember? 331dot (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One more account is there but I didn't remember as it was blocked at the spot.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 15:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb I made those edits as I didn't realized about Wikipedia needed reliable sources. Majorly I made the edits as a fan boy. Now onwards I only request in the talk pages of the respective pages. As positive contribution I will contribute in the boxoffice of Malayalam and Tamil movies as that is my interest. But I won't change in any pages directly as I only request in the talk pages. I won't make the mistake again as every human has a second chance and I am looking for that chance. I would like to contribute in the Wikipedia. In the above other accounts I used was

  • Mollywood.lover
  • Hackerwala111
  • Malayalammojo

Please unblock me as I won't make the same mistake againMhdsuhail111 (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't addressed the vandalism. That had nothing to do with reliable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb I have done vandalism in movie pages like Loham Rajamanikyam Bhaskar The Rascal Gangster Mayavi Utopiayile Rajavu and in Mammootty pages. Mostly I made changes in the boxoffice figures of this movies. Now onwards I will contribute to the movies boxoffice figures with reliable sources in the respective talk pages. Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 06:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do the vandalism? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb I did it as I am a fan of Mammootty. Also as I am a starter I dont know about that the reliable sources are required. I think that it is just like IMBD. Now I understand the policies to be followed in Wikipedia.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 09:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Cyphoidbomb Admin please take necessary steps in this block. I mentioned why I did the vandalism and I promise I wont make any mistake again.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mhdsuhail111! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:13, Monday, December 23, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Cyphoidbomb I wont make any vandalism in wikipedia. Please unblock me. In above I mentioned the pages that I make edits without providing any reliable sources. Please give me a second chance. Like other wikipedia editors I would also like to contribute ti Wikipedia.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mhdsuhail111! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:24, Thursday, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Materialscientist Admin, I requested for Unblock before few days. I had explained the Vandalism done to the user Cyphoidbomb I has explained all the things he asked. But latest he is not replying. He may be busy, as I am asking again please unblock me as you blocked me. I have mentioned all the things I have done. As a starter I not much professional in it. Also I done many mistakes. It wont be happen again.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 11:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make another formal unblock request for it to be seen. I suggest you read WP:GAB to learn how to make an acceptable unblock request. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

Materialscientist

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have created new accounts after this accounts was blocked. The accounts are Mhdsuhail007 Hackerwala111 Malayalammojo The reason that I did wrong was editing malayalam movies boxoffice figures without providing any reliable sources. Admins has warned me many time. But I dont take it serious. The movie pages I edited was malayalam movie pages. Those are Gangster (2014 film) Mayavi (2007 Film) Bhaskar The Rascal Rajamanikyam Loham Utopiayile Rajavu Because of this it has given many fake reports for the film. The users may think it was right and I did it against the wikipedia policies. Because of this It violated the terms & conditions and Policies of Wikipedia. Now onwards I will contribute in the malayalam movies. If any changes is required I will discuss in the Talkpage of specific pages with providing Reliable Sources. I wont repeat the same mistake again. Please make my account unblock. I wont repeat it again as I understand the terms to be followed in Wikipedia. I am humbly requesting to Unblock my account Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been so abusive for so many years, you are now considered banned by the community, under WP:3X. You have essentially no chance to be unblocked without a topic ban for malayalam movies, and possibly a much broader topic ban. And you'll need to follow the instructions in WP:UNBAN if you wish to edit here again. Nothing here comes remotely close. Yamla (talk) 12:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla So what is the next step I have to take. I done these mistakes without knowing the policies of Wikipedia. I wont do the same again. Please give me a second chance please. If I still make the same mistake block me entirely. Now please give me a chance please.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 05:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hai Admins, I have been requesting you for a long time for my unblock request. Last time admins told I will not be unblocked. So I did a appeal block and one admin give reply that I have to talk in my talk page as I can edit in my talkpage. I am humbly requesting to unblock my account and I wont repeat it again. Please give me a last chance please Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is either deliberate trolling or demonstrating you lack sufficient competence to follow basic directions. If your next unblock request does not follow the instructions you've been given, you'll lose access to this talk page. I'll also note that you continued evading your block with Suhailshahid10 just a few days ago. There's no reasonable chance of being unbanned while you continue evading. Note this decline is procedural rather than on the merits (though there are no merits to this request). Again: follow the instructions you've been given. WP:UNBAN, and what 331dot explains below, and what multiple people have explained above. Yamla (talk) 14:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are now considered to be community banned, the community will need a statement from you to review, that explains what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what constructive edits you will make. As also noted above, you will likely need to agree to some sort of topic ban from at least malayalam movies, if not movies in general. Please write your statement below so it can be copied to the appropriate forum(your unblock request is nowhere near sufficient). 331dot (talk) 10:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Admin Suhailshahid10 This is not my account I promise. Please believe me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdsuhail111 (talk • contribs)
Suhailshahid10 was established through both behavioural and technical evidence and is not in doubt. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Admin Please understand that is not my account. Please believe me Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 11:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simple denial is insufficient. We know it was someone editing the same articles as you from the same IP address on the same device. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Bro I feel like you dont want to unblock me. Simply you can say at the first of the conversation that you will not unblock me. I dont know why you are telling lie and keep me blocked. This much you feared me. Feeling Laughy Admin BrosMhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you either can't or won't address the concerns given to you, I have decided to remove talk page access. That will leave you with WP:UTRS to make further appeals. I suggest that you use them to provide an explanation that actually addresses the reason for the block- simply denying it is not sufficient as there is technical evidence. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for "Mhdsuhail111" UTRS 36608

UTRS appeal #36608 has been opened..

The content looks the same as the previously declined unblock except accepts TBAN on Malayalam films topics. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 36608 declined

UTRS appeal #36608 has been declined.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 42341

User requests unblock at UTRS appeal #42341. Preparing to restore TPA and carry to AN. @331dot, Yamla, and Cyphoidbomb: as they have worked this case before. Will need checkuser, 'cause, damn. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear that. Thanks for letting us know. --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had not seen the part about needing to edit on behalf of their company till I reread. Frustrating. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked on Wikipedia for a long time. I know that my appeals may be wasting your time. I have been blocked on Wikipedia because of creating multiple accounts. The accounts I created after this account are User:Anji_mba, User:Mhdsuhail30, User:Mhdsuhail123, User:Muhammed.suhail, User:Hackerwala111, User:Malayalammojo, User:Mhdsuhail007 and User:Psychotraveller. In my confirmed sock puppet User:Baijujnair is not my account. He is a colleague who works with me. I think he may start the account using the same Wi-Fi of company. You can please cross check the ip is from Bangalore, India. Another account is shown in my Suspected Sock puppet User:Thadevoos_Jr, I am not behind this account who created this account. The mentioned above are the accounts created by me. With this created accounted I started disruptive edits in Wikipedia articles, basically in Malayalam movies. The movie articles I edited using User:Mhdsuhail111 are Gangster_(2014_film), Mayavi_(2007_film), Bhaskar_the_Rascal, Rajamanikyam, Loham and Utopiayile_Rajavu. In these articles I made the edits on box office figures of those movies. I did these edits because basically I am a Mammootty fan. In many newspaper articles I saw the box office collection of the movies. I was not bothered about providing reliable sources to make these changes. I made many fluctuated figures in box office collection of those movies. From my sock puppet account User:Anji_mba I was just doing the edits for my company. I was just started editing in this account in Neobank section and suddenly I was blocked. From User:Mhdsuhail30 account I didn't made any edits. After creating the account I has been blocked. From User:Mhdsuhail123 I make edits on Kerala_Varma_Pazhassi_Raja_(film) and Pulimurugan box office figures. From User:Muhammed.suhail I was in discussion on Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films to add movie The_Great_Father, Ramaleela, Premam, Kerala_Varma_Pazhassi_Raja_(film) in the list. With this account I created the page for Malayalam movie Masterpiece_(2017_film). With the account User:Hackerwala111 I started discussion in Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films to add some movies to the list. With the account User:Malayalammojo I edits in the articles like Oru_Kuttanadan_Blog and Mamangam_(2019_film). But those edits were made with providing reliable sources. With the account User:Mhdsuhail007 I made discussions on Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films talk pages to add movie Ramaleela. With User:Psychotraveller account I was in discussion on Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films talk pages and in Neobank Page to add my company name with proper sources. These all are the violations I done with my accounts I created. I am so sorry for that. I know my sorry won't make these violations to the good side.

If I get unblocked I am sure that I can provide good things to Wikipedia. From my Sock puppets accounts I created, admins can check the edits I made. I made lot changes in talk pages and discussed with the admins in the respective articles. Using my sock puppet account User:Muhammed.suhail I created the page for Masterpiece_(2017_film). I am 100% sure that I can provide these types of edits on Wikipedia. My interesting subject is movies, and I am able to provide the information regarding movies in the respective talk pages of the articles. I can provide information of Malayalam movies shooting dates, release dates, and news links, cast, First look release dates, Teaser/trailer release dates etc with the reliable sources. This information can provide more valuable to the articles in the Wikipedia in Malayalam movies section.

I know that because of my disruptive edits many difficulties are faced by the admins to clear that mistakes. And also its cause the credibility of those articles on Wikipedia. From now onwards I will provide 100% genuine information from my side with reliable sources. If I need to be banned from the Malayalam movies section I am ok. Then I will be contributing to the Neobank page. I am working in a Neobank startup in Bangalore, India. So I am able to provide the updated news to the pages. It will help those articles more valuable to the readers on Wikipedia. I am waiting for a positive response from the admins.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were socking yesterday. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are considered to be community banned, meaning that no administrator may unilaterally lift the block, and that there must be a community discussion regarding your request. Is this the statement you wish to be transferred to the administrator's noticeboard? 331dot (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:331dot Firstly I am sorry if any comments from my side hurt you. You can go with this satement to the administrator's noticeboard. Can you please help me whether I need to make any changes on this.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the statement over. If you have any additional comments, you may post them here and they will be transferred as soon as practicable. 331dot (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:331dot In Administrative noticeboard I saw that an admin User:Jpgordon says that User:Dhoni.csk is my sock puppet account. It's not my account I am 100% sure. I don't know how to prove it. I swear that this is not my account.

User:331dot Please pass the below statement to Administrative noticeboard. User:Dhoni.csk is not my account. I don't have any proofs to claim that it is not my account. The only proof I have is my words. That is not my account. The last account I created is User:Psychotraveller, as I mentioned in my appeal.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 09:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can move this over there if you really want, but the socking is checkuser-confirmed, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it so a simple denial is insufficient. If that is not your sock, you will need to explain why technical evidence would lead to a different conclusion. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:331dot Still I am using Wikipedia on my Company Wi-Fi and in Company lap. Will that may be the error. Because my company colleagues are looking to add a page about our company on Wikipedia. For that they created accounts. User:Dhoni.csk may be created by them. Using the same Wi-Fi may cause the same IP address. So the technical evidence provided by User:Jpgordon is regrading the accounts are used in same IP address. In case of User:Dhoni.csk also my company colleague may create the account using company Wi-Fi.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 10:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your colleagues will likely end up blocked too, see WP:MEAT. I would suggest that you advise your colleagues to cease efforts to edit about your company. It's likely going to be a long time, if ever, before unbanning you can be considered. 331dot (talk) 10:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:331dot I advised them to stop creating accounts. Now they asked me to appeal my account as soon as possible. They have given the PR works to third party teams and the company officials advised every employee in the company not to create accounts on Wikipedia. In two days Wikipedia will be blocked to other employees, so no more accounts will be created. I will try my 100% to stop creating accounts by my colleagues in company Wi-Fi.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's still going to be at least six months, if not longer, before further discussion of lifting your ban will be considered. Until then, there isn't anything more to be done at this time. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"They have given the PR works to third party teams" This will still be considered a violation of WP:MEAT and will count against any further unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:331dot Anyway I will wait for six months too. The mistake was done by me, so I have to face the consequences. So I can apply for a unblock request on October 2021. Thanks for all the support given to me.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

user:Yamla I am not responsible for the third party access provided by the company. The company officials handed over to them. Third party access means they paid to a freelancer who is an admin and create an article for money. It was the company decision, and I am not an authority who can speak a word against it.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is unfortunate that your company is acting inappropriately in this manner. This will make it hard to unblock you in the future, as per WP:MEAT. Note that I do not believe your claim that they paid a Wikipedia administrator to do this. If they did, please provide evidence (if the evidence is private, you may use email) and we will investigate. --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla They got it from freelancer website. Anyway I will try to block it. I am just an employee who working in there marketing team. they won't provide me any proofs they contacted or paid him. I will try to block the payment and will block them from giving it to third party. Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:331dot Can you please pass the statement below to Administrative Notice board. I understand the mistakes I have done. Because of me my company is also facing the issue. Please give me a last and final chance. I will wait for six months and please unban me on behalf of Wikipedia:OFFER. I will continue to contribute without any disruptive or abuse manner. Please take this as a apology from my side and give me a last and final chance.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works. You can ask to be unbanned in six months, there won't be agreement to do it in six months. 331dot (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok User:331dot Will wait for some long time without any socking anymore and will reappel for the ban. thanks for the supportMhdsuhail111 (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 02-20-24

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhdsuhail111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have appealed to remove my ban before 2 years and half years. The one who reviewed my appeal has told me to wait for more time and reapply. Kindly give me an apology for what I did and was not familiar with the Wikipedia rules. Now I have waited as much time as I can. From now onwards I will not focus on any movie sections directly but will give suggestions on the respective talk page. Now I have done my studies in finance and doing research in Fintech firms. For that, I need access to my Wikipedia account. So I can help my contributions to Wikipedia with what I have found with the relevant references. Kindly reconsider my appeal and please give me a proper resolution. Because of this ban, I am not able to create any other accounts also. Please help me out, guys. Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request was declined by the community. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

You will still need to request unblocking/unbanning at WP:AN. Are you still an employee of a marketing team? Please explain, "have waited as much time as I can." What's the hurry? Please explain why you need to edit Wikipedia, for "studies in finance and doing research in Fintech firms". Are you and your colleagues still editing Wikipedia for pay? Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Link to unban discussion. Courtesy ping @Jpgordon: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser finds no recent socking or other abuse on the IPs this account is using. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deepfriedokra, currently I am a social media marketer in a company handling social media platforms. So if I can become an editor I can add the company page and also I will mention on my user page that the edits as paid. No more edits will be there from this account. But I go through the template to be added to my user age. But for an employee of the company a template is not available. Did I need to use the paid template itself in my userpage.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is absolutely not a social media platform. Wikipedia isn't a place for companies to tell about themselves. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see you being unblocked to conduct marketing on Wikipedia, regardless of any PAID declaration. Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia[[ and not a marketing venue. .What 331dot said. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not using the Wikipedia for any promotion of the company. As its a encyclopedia we can provide information about a valid thing to the public. Its known that we can't do any paid promotion in the Wikipedia. My main objective is to give an idea to the public what does the company do and what all are the useful features that offers. As far as I know Wikipedia helps the public to know about different topics that they wish to refer. As I am just creating an article about the company only. With an article what it means about marketing. Many company articles are there and is that articles where for marketing. I am just providing an article about the company and it is not for any marketing. Also, kindly note that I won't directly create an article. I will create an article and will send for a approval from the respective user/admin. From now on wards, no direct edits will be there from my side. Kindly give me a last chance and if I do any random edits without any source you can directly block me from the Wikipedia and I won't come again for a unblock request, if its a valid reason.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 07:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will ask Materialscientist,. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. This must go to the admin notice board. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot: Do you think this is sufficient to carry to WP:AN? I foresee carrying the Unblock discussion as a WP:BLOCKQUOTE perhaps. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did I need to do anything from my side. Kindly mention.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't know. I want to hear from 331dot first -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably enough to bring to AN but I think it might just waste time there; this won't be successful. They still want to promote their company("My main objective is to give an idea to the public what does the company do and what all are the useful features that offers"; " As its a encyclopedia we can provide information about a valid thing to the public", etc.) Might be worth getting a community decision here, though. 331dot (talk) 11:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every article regarding the company is like that only. Need to aware to the public what the company is. I won't promote the products or anything. Just give the basic idea what the company is. I know there are different sources to promote the company products. This much effort did i need to take for promoting the company in Wikipedia. Its all about giving a basic idea. My article won't be written as a company. I will provide the articles as per the available sources. I won't mention the products, sign up to the platform anything relate to the promotion. Just a basic knowledge about what the company is.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What we are telling you is that "Just give the basic idea what the company is" is promotion. You don't have to be actively selling something or soliciting customers. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. That's what your company website and social media are for. Wikipedia is interested in what others say about your company and what makes it important, not what it says about itself. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've carried over what we had as of this morning to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblock/unban request from Mhdsuhail111 (2) You should subscribe to that thread, and when your reply, ping the person you are replying to. You might want them to carry your reply over. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I was premature and need to revert it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not able to reply there. As you can check in Wikipedia how many companies started Wikipedia page. This is also a company page right Jio, so what they are doing here. Cred is also another example which has a wikipedia page. So as per wikipedia the page has to be removed. It is also a promotion right? They have social media handles to promote them, then why Wikipedia. Like that many companies started Wikipedia page. So what is the intention with those pages. Jio is an example only. Like this many company pages are there. I think you guys know there are many agencies to create articles in Wikipedia, the mistake I done is I came here and informed about this. Anyway, is there any chance to unblock my ban in Wikipedia. I have waited for long 3 years without breaking any rules from Wikipedia as the instructions given. I can edit normal edits right by providing proper sources. I won't create article about my company. As a user I can make edits right with proper sources and following Wikipedia rules and regulations. Please help me out sir.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 05:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You gravely misunderstand what it is we do here. Companies do not have pages here, that they own and control. Our articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic. Companies trying to force the issue and create articles about themselves sometimes succeed, but not usually- and they must disclose their status as employees per the Terms of Use. If you have evidence that Cred employees have edited the article about their company without disclosing it, please offer it.
If you are agreeing to not edit about your company, please tell what topics you will edit about instead. These should be unrelated to any conflicts of interest that you have. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you 100% that some other individuals created those company articles. I worked as a freelancer in an agency as social media marketer and I know how many Wikipedia works coming. Anyway just leave it. The thing I done was firstly I mentioned I want to create the article on my company. I just tell the truth. Just think I hide it and do this. Anyway I am not going to create article on my company. I will create articles of new movies that announced. Will not include box office reports, only submit articles of new movies and also suggest in the talk pages of the movies and list regarding box office collection. I won't directly edit any box office reports directly from my side. I will provide the suggestion with reliable source in the respective talk page. I will give my 100% that I won't do any vandalism in Wikipedia like I did before. At that time I was not aware about the rules. Sorry for that. Kindly unblock me please.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not 100% certain of anything, other than death and taxes. Yes, people can choose to be dishonest and abuse the fact that we operate on good faith, and can even get away with it for awhile, but they are usually eventually discovered. Undisclosed paid editing must be demonstrated, suspecting it is insufficient. As I assume you have no evidence about undisclosed Cred employees, I advise you to withdraw the claim. The rest of your comment will be evaluated by the community. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Any off-Wiki evidence of UPE should be emailed to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org for review and investigation. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the claim that I made and I withdraw the same. Kindly unblock my account as it shows my unblock request has been declined. I'm sorry for the claim and I won't make the same mistake again. Did I need to raise a request again. Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, your request was declined by the community. No individual admin could have unblocked you before, that's why we went to WP:AN. Now even more so. You are not eligible for unblock consideration for six months from now. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I have already waited for 3 years. You can check it. On this 3 years, I didn't made a request also. Again I have to wait for 6 months. I think any single one is showing any interest in my unblock appeal. I confirms that I won't create any page for my company and I will suggest edits and create article on latest movies to be released. Also, i confirms that directly I won't create an article. Please help me bro, please request them to consider my request and unblock. Its a humble request.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your block was reviewed. It was declined. No further requests will be considered for at least six months. Yes, this is indeed because the community is not interested in your unblock requests for at least six months. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I already waited for almost 3 years still I have to wait another 6 months. I am so sorry for the mistake I have done. Kindly give me a last chance. I will prove I will do the right thing. Please give me a last chance.Mhdsuhail111 (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. And frankly, it's highly unlikely you'll be unblocked in six months. But there's absolutely no chance you'll be unblocked sooner than that. To help you out, I will protect this page from any further edits from you for six months. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mhdsuhail111&oldid=1209756994"