User talk:Mathenyovann

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mathenyovann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 12:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Parasery[edit]

Hello Mathenyovann,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged West Parasery for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Newrunner769 (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalungady[edit]

Hello, Mathenyovann. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kalungady, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharasan Vethamanickam[edit]

Hello Mathenyovann,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maharasan Vethamanickam for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brother.... Sambavar is the community who people lived in Kanniyakumari District majorily. Sambavar Wikipedia also be there from 2011 to recent years... But past 2 years some people intentionally redirect it. The tradition of paraiyars and Sambavars are different. Paraiyar have subgroup Samban not sambavar. Sambavars are agriculture community, not drummer community. Many traditions are different. But both are from same family clan like Kallar- Maravar, Padaiyatchi-Vanniyar. When partition of Kerala Sambavar and Vattiparaiyar both are categorised under Sambavar community. In Kanniyakumari only, you will have Separate sambavar community certificate not parayar mentioned. Some people says Kerala Govt give the name sambavar to parayar... Yes but not for all area Paraiyars. Kerala paraiyars( vatti parayar) wants to join Samabavar name, then kandan kumaran helped for it. Nowadays also you can see separate sambavar, parayar area and marriage in Kanniyakumari. They from same clan but not same traditions. Some sambavars from Sambuvarayar dynasty, some are from Nanjil Valluvan Clan. So Please remove redirect for significance of sambavar. Mathenyovann (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 05:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharasan Vethamanickam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maharasan Vethamanickam, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 07:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to a community enforced topic ban[edit]

For repeated disruptive editing around castes, especially Sambavars, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

indefinitely topic banned from anything related to castes and social groups of South Asia across all namespaces on the English Wikipedia.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 12:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve AK.Chellaiya[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mathenyovann, thanks for creating AK.Chellaiya!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalungady[edit]

The article Kalungady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since creation in 2017. A previous article was deleted in March2017, then this was re-created by apparently the same editor, and has not been improved since then. An "external link" was recently added but appears to be "Tamil Christian site", not a reliable source or an appropriate external link. This place is shown on maps as existing, but without further sourced information the article is not an asset to the encyclopedia. The Catherine Booth Hospital makes no mention of Kalungady: its own website says it is at "Vadasery, Nagercoil".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalungady for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalungady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalungady until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 08:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm 31.41.45.190. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Sambavars. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 31.41.45.190 (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sambavars, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Ji11720 (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brother.... Sambavar is the community who people lived in Kanniyakumari District majorily. Sambavar Wikipedia also be there from 2011 to recent years... But past 2 years some people intentionally redirect it. The tradition of paraiyars and Sambavars are different. Paraiyar have subgroup Samban not sambavar. Sambavars are agriculture community, not drummer community. Many traditions are different. But both are from same family clan like Kallar- Maravar, Padaiyatchi-Vanniyar. When partition of Kerala Sambavar and Vattiparaiyar both are categorised under Sambavar community. In Kanniyakumari only, you will have Separate sambavar community certificate not parayar mentioned. Some people says Kerala Govt give the name sambavar to parayar... Yes but not for all area Paraiyars. Kerala paraiyars( vatti parayar) wants to join Samabavar name, then kandan kumaran helped for it. Nowadays also you can see separate sambavar, parayar area and marriage in Kanniyakumari. They from same clan but not same traditions. Some sambavars from Sambuvarayar dynasty, some are from Nanjil Valluvan Clan. So Please remove redirect for significance of sambavar. Mathenyovann (talk) 09:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sambavar[edit]

Please explain your blanking. I have reverted your edits.Xx236 (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brother.... Sambavar is the community who people lived in Kanniyakumari District majorily. Sambavar Wikipedia also be there from 2011 to recent years... But past 2 years some people intentionally redirect it. The tradition of paraiyars and Sambavars are different. Paraiyar have subgroup Samban not sambavar. Sambavars are agriculture community, not drummer community. Many traditions are different. But both are from same family clan like Kallar- Maravar, Padaiyatchi-Vanniyar. When partition of Kerala Sambavar and Vattiparaiyar both are categorised under Sambavar community. In Kanniyakumari only, you will have Separate sambavar community certificate not parayar mentioned. Some people says Kerala Govt give the name sambavar to parayar... Yes but not for all area Paraiyars. Kerala paraiyars( vatti parayar) wants to join Samabavar name, then kandan kumaran helped for it. Nowadays also you can see separate sambavar, parayar area and marriage in Kanniyakumari. They from same clan but not same traditions. Some sambavars from Sambuvarayar dynasty, some are from Nanjil Valluvan Clan. So Please remove redirect for significance of sambavar. Mathenyovann (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brother.... Sambavar is the community who people lived in Kanniyakumari District majorily. Sambavar Wikipedia also be there from 2011 to recent years... But past 2 years some people intentionally redirect it. The tradition of paraiyars and Sambavars are different. Paraiyar have subgroup Samban not sambavar. Sambavars are agriculture community, not drummer community. Many traditions are different. But both are from same family clan like Kallar- Maravar, Padaiyatchi-Vanniyar. When partition of Kerala Sambavar and Vattiparaiyar both are categorised under Sambavar community. In Kanniyakumari only, you will have Separate sambavar community certificate not parayar mentioned. Some people says Kerala Govt give the name sambavar to parayar... Yes but not for all area Paraiyars. Kerala paraiyars( vatti parayar) wants to join Samabavar name, then kandan kumaran helped for it. Nowadays also you can see separate sambavar, parayar area and marriage in Kanniyakumari. They from same clan but not same traditions. Some sambavars from Sambuvarayar dynasty, some are from Nanjil Valluvan Clan. So Please remove redirect for significance of sambavar. Mathenyovann (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Admin noticeboard entry[edit]

Hi, I took you the admin noticeboard. Unexplained blanking of pages, changing redirects and renaming them are not cool. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 21:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Look, Mathenyovann, competence and communication are required. ~~As far as I can tell, aside from edit summaries, you've never communicated with anyone on Wikipedia, ever.~~ You've also violated your WP:CASTE topic ban on multiple occasions, but your problematic editing seems to go beyond that. Some of your most recent edits, for example, seem to be indistinguishable from vandalism or at least gross incompetence. Take your latest edit: Changed redirect target from Paraiyar to S [the letter S!] (diff). What even is that? So you'll have to account for... whatever that is. And ultimately, you'll need to commit to cease editing disruptively and to communicating better (which is to say, at all), as well as adhere to your topic ban. Thank you.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 00:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I see that in the threads above, you are in fact communicating (my oversight with your username), but I'm afraid that changes little, seeing as all of your communications willfully ignore your 2017 topic ban (←click). Which is to say: the one thing you're not allowed to do is all that you've been doing. Not sure why that has fallen under the radar. Of course, there's also the overall weirdness, like redirecting to the letter S, and so on. I suspect there's a language barrier, but this is the English Wikipedia, so a sufficient command of the English language is required. I dunno, maybe consider contributing to the Hindi Wikipedia, instead...? Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thanks again. Regards, El_C 03:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Because you are continuing to violate your topic ban here on your talk page while blocked, I have e revoked your talk page access. Please read WP:UTRS for your unblock options. Cullen328 (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]