User talk:Markk7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have added a fair use rationale to File:RCAAA.jpg for you since you made the effort to comply.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wasn't too sure how that should be layed out. Could I use that table that you inserted as a template for the future?--Markk7 (talk) 00:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can but it's a tailored template, only for video covers. See Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline generally, and Category:Non-free use rationale templates for all of the specific templates one might use.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thepartyzone.png needs authorship information.[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Thepartyzone.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|Markk7}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Thepartyzone.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thepartyzone.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sorry, I got distracted. I did change it, but you may have to reload the page (control-F5) to see the changes. It ended up being pretty easy and shouldn't break anything. Prodego talk 08:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]