User talk:Maias/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our July backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the August blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for New Zealand Coot

Alex Shih^Talk 13:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Chatham Coot

Alex Shih^Talk 13:51, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation

Guild of Copy Editors August Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of sixteen people who signed up for this blitz, nine copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 26 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the September drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the September drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Pelican (estimated annual readership: 306,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Pelican to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deception Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hope Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cape Lindsey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ({{Coord|61|6|S|55|29|W|source:GNIS|display=title}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Importance of William Turner (naturalist) to ornithology

Hi, if Turner published the first printed book devoted to ornithology, is 'low' importance the right grade? All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Chiswick Chap. I guess the assessment of project importance is fairly subjective with the birds project, especially with regard to articles that are not directly about bird taxa. What I have been doing is going through bird project tagged articles lacking an importance assessment and making a quick assessment. If you feel that Turner's project importance should be elevated, please do so; you presumably know the article and subject better than I do and I will not quibble with your assessment. Cheers. Maias (talk) 09:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I'll give him a 'mid', it all depends on so many factors. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The September 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the October blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 05:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joint Services Expedition to Elephant Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expedition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive

Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Montebello Islands list

Hi! I've been working on Sortable list of islands of Western Australia, and came across the Montebello Islands list. I downloaded the spreadsheet used as a reference, but I can't work out how to use it to give me list of the Montabello Islands. Could you enlighten me please? Thanks in advance. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Pdfpdf. I am afraid that I cannot enlighten you on the matter as I am not enlightened on it myself. I did not have anything to do with the construction of that list. As I recall, I split it off from the Montebello Islands article, which it was severely unbalancing and which I was trying to improve, and created the list article to put it in. I think the list was probably put together originally by User:Ptilinopus, to whom an enquiry may be fruitful. Good luck! Cheers. Maias (talk) 14:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks! Pdfpdf (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Antonio de Dios may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {[reflist}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Low importance rated birds

Hey, I notice that you are changing the importance of some birds namely Ostrich and Greater Rhea, and I am not sure low on these is correct. Ostrich, in particular, should probably be a high but I would even think medium is acceptable. Anyway, I understand that whenever something like this gets changed you are going to get a 1001 opinions on the right way. I don't want to cause problems, maybe if you disagree emphatically, we should create a discussion in the Bird project. Thoughts? speednat (talk) 05:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Speednat. I am just trying to standardize importance levels with regard to bird taxa, i.e. species - low, genera and monotypic species - mid, families - high, orders - top. There is (or has been) more than one ostrich species in Struthio, so I would assess them as of low importance, at least with regard to the bird project. They might, of course, be of a different level of importance in another project - such as Agriculture because of ostrich farming, or Mythology because of cultural significance. Anyway, that was my approach. Maybe it needs sorting out more formally with the bird project. You are, course, free, in the absence of any formal guideline, to apply whatever level of importance you see fit. However, I know that this can be very subjective; there are lots of birds that have special meaning to particular groups of people, or in localized areas, and my approach is to be as objective as possible by using the taxonomy as a guide. Cheers. Maias (talk) 06:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

That actually sounds organized and refined. I have always been a person of systems and rules. Barring a discussion and its results, I don't see a reason to change as of yet. I will probably instigate a discussion at some point, because there are probably exceptions to your or any rule system set up, any way thanks for the reply.speednat (talk) 22:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT

Please stop removing DEFAULTSORT entries, such as with this edit. You have done this more than once, I would ask you to be more careful. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 16:19, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jan. I don't think you need a defsort template for such entries. Not all categories sort the same way and it is more appropriate to use sortkeys on the individual cats that need it. Cheers. Maias (talk) 23:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Maias. Not all categories are explicitly defined in this way. If you look at the article in question you will see it is a member of these categories:

• Mountains of Princess Elizabeth Land
• Antarctic Specially Protected Areas
• Princess Elizabeth Land geography stubs
• Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the USGS Geographic Names Information System

only the first two of which are stated explicitly. If you need to change the way a particular category sorts I suggest you override it in that category but leave the default sort in place. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 10:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, noted. Cheers. Maias (talk) 10:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black-headed Pitta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morphology and Type locality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Animals by year of formal description

Please do not add subcategories of Category:Animals by year of formal description (such as Category:Animals described in 1873) to articles at genus titles (e.g. Leptopogon). These categories are for taxa at the rank of species only (as shown by the parent categories Category:Species by year of formal description, Category:Species described in 1873, etc.), and should not be applied to genera. Articles at vernacular-name titles can appear in categories for both genera and species, because the same vernacular name may apply to both, but articles at scientific-name titles must be categorised appropriately. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

OK, noted. Maias (talk) 11:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mindanao Bleeding-heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013 GOCE drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors November 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The November 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the December blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)

Books & Bytes

Sign up for monthly delivery

Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.

Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...

Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...

Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...

Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...

Read Books & Bytes

The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs) 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thick-billed Grasswren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfred North (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wajee Nature Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Wajee Nature Park''' is a bird conservancy and nature park located in Mukuruwe-ini, central Kenya]]. It is set amidst the spectacular country between [[Mount Kenya]] ant the [[Aberdare Range]] and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Books about Australian Aborigines

Category:Books about Australian Aborigines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

On a point of detail, it was named Category:Books on Australian Aborigines when you created it. – Fayenatic London 14:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

GOCE December 2013 Blitz wrap-up and January Drive invitation

December Notes from the Guild of Copy Editors The December blitz ran from December 8–14. The theme for this blitz was articles tied in some way to religion. Seven editors knocked out 20 articles over the course of the week. Our next blitz will be in February, with a theme to be determined. Feel free to make theme suggestions at the Guild talk page! The January 2014 Backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on January 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on January 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copy edit all articles tagged in October and November 2012 and complete all requests placed before the end of 2013. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in October and November 2012", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! Coordinator election: Voting is open for candidates to serve as GOCE coordinators from 1 January through 30 June 2014. Voting will run until the end of December. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

GOCE 2013 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2013 Annual Report The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations! Our 2013 Annual Report is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Jonesey95 Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McMurdo Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Observation Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawaiian Gallinule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarsus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Débarquement Rock may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 1946–1947), surveys and geological studies made by the [[French Antarctic Expedition]] in 1950–1952), with the seaward position of Débarquement Rock correlating with the feature named by d'Urville.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bird egg may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (the [[Grey Partridge]]). [[avian clutch size|Clutch size]] may vary latitudinally within a species]]. Some birds lay eggs even when not fertilized; it is not uncommon for pet owners to find their

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machaerina, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Culm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Griffiths Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launceston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

March GOCE copyedit drive

Notes from the Guild of Copy Editors The March 2014 backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles in need of copyediting. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copyedit all articles tagged in December 2012 and January 2013 and to complete all requests placed in January 2014. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copyedits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: number of articles, number of words, number of articles over 5,000 words, number of articles tagged in December 2012 and January 2013 and the longest article. We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)|} Books & Bytes, Issue 4 Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014 News for February from your Wikipedia Library. Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 1 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elatostema grande, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peduncle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Grand Bassin – Le Dimitile Important Bird Area Hello, Maias, and thank you for your contributions! An article you worked on Grand Bassin – Le Dimitile Important Bird Area, appears to be directly copied from http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/sitefactsheet.php?id=6766. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted. It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Grand Bassin – Le Dimitile Important Bird Area if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 02:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC) Common Gull to Mew Gull So it's not looking good for me to continue with the Wikiproject based on the latest comments in move review, so thanks for trying to keep me around. I hate drawing a line in the sand, but I think it is that important. Send me a note if you'd like me to comment on a policy, and I'll be glad to oblige, but as far as content is concerned, I can't continue until Common Gull is changed. The IOC could create 2 species, or the IOC could change the common name to Common Gull, after which I'll be back, but until then.....Just wanted to say thanks for asking me to stick around....Pvmoutside (talk) 05:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Ravine de la Grande Chaloupe Important Bird Area Hello Maias, I saw that you created an article: Ravine de la Grande Chaloupe Important Bird Area Oups, I thought, what's this? This does simple not exist and nor ever existed (I live in that place for 20 years, did I miss something?? :) ) Part of that valley (not the village) is part of the Réunion National Park - yes there are also birds, but there's nothing special around birds, no sacturary (but the national park) and nothing elso. Best would be, you place it onto the delete list. Might irrate some users who don't know about this. Best regards user:Tonton Bernardo PS: just see the post above for Grand Bassin – Le Dimitile Important Bird Area - this applies for the Dimitile also ! That's a mountain, yes inside of the same National Park, and certainly there are also birds :) - and maybe also for the others from Réunion that you may have created from that web side. They have no status at all. Best would be: => just delete them. If you want absolutely to have them recorded somewhere, why not make a chapter under the Réunion National Park. Would fit better on that page. regards again user:Tonton Bernardo Hi Tonton. Thanks for your interest and input. My information comes from the BirdLife International (BLI) factsheet where you will find a list of references on which it was based. My understanding of Important Bird Areas (IBAs) is that they are not official designations by the countries or territories concerned, that they may or may not coincide with some officially designated entity (such as a national park or otherwise protected area}, and that they are based on surveys or assessments of what birds are present. So the IBA may have no official status on Reunion whatsoever. Its status as an entity is based only BLI’s assessment of its bird conservation importance, depending on what birds are present, in what numbers, and their threat status. Cheers. Maias (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC) GOCE March drive wrapup Guild of Copy Editors March 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The March 2014 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the April blitz! – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by Guild of Copy Editors March 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Thanks to all who participated in the drive and helped out behind the scenes. 42 people signed up for this drive and 28 of these completed at least one article. Final results are available here. Progress report: Articles tagged during the target months of December 2012 and January 2013 were reduced from 177 to 33, and the overall backlog was reduced by 13 articles. The total backlog was 2,902 articles at the end of March. On the Requests page during March, 26 copy edit requests were completed, all requests from January 2014 were completed, and the length of the queue was reduced by 11 articles. Blitz!: The April blitz will run from April 13–19, with a focus on the Requests list. Sign up now! – Your drive coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC) JSTOR Survey (and an update) Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR! It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR: SURVEY Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC) Status of the (Australian) Register of the National Estate Hi Maias, I noticed your edit of SS Yongala and wish to inquire if you are aware that Register of the National Estate is not longer operational as February 2007. Its job is now done by other registers and it is only available as an archived register. FYI, I have been progressively removing references to the Register as I progressively update articles in my areas of interest (including wrecked ships). However, the archived register is a good source for citations when none can be found elsewhere. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 02:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Hi Cowdy; thanks for explaining that. I guess the category should be changed to that of whatever register it is now on. Cheers. Maias (talk) 02:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Books & Bytes - Issue 5 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes Issue 5, March 2014 by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs) New Visiting Scholar positions TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program Australian articles get a link to librarians Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia" Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC) April blitz wrap-up and May copyediting drive invitation Guild of Copy Editors April 2014 Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of 17 people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 28 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the May drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014 Today's motto... → You write with ease, to show your breeding, But easy writing's curst hard reading. Nominate one today! Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months. Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC) This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category). Disambiguation link notification for May 6 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primophaps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 13 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Australotadorna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Type locality Matuku (genus) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Matuku It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Colin Bradshaw Thanks for the edit on his page. I did not know how to do that. I wrote to someone who has a photo of CB, but have have not heard back yet. Maybe someone else will see this and add one. Please ask questions about what I posted. I am still learning. RC711 (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Hi RC711. Yes, it takes a little time to get used to Wikipedia mark-up and style conventions. A good start with the article. I suggest the next step is probably to put the bulleted information points into flowing prose, and to add properly formatted references where appropriate. Try looking at similar biographical articles and examining their structure. Also, if and when you add images, follow the rules regarding copyright. Cheers. Maias (talk) 00:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Your suggestions are in line with what I found in other biographies. It just takes time to change notes into narrative, and to find the right balance when creating references. I have some personal matters to attend to, so I am not sure how quickly I can make improvements. I am happy if someone else wants to work on it. I am not used to collaborative editing here. I got most of these raw notes together, and I can add a few more bits of evidence to his bio. Could I expect that someone else, perhaps a better editor, would work on it for a while? I wanted to fill an empty spot, and I am pretty good at research, so that is what I have done. Now it takes different skills. I probably will get better at writing bios over time, but for now I am already starting on an overall classification of bird*/ornitholog* material on Wikipedia. Is it OK to leave CB, in this state, for someone else? If CB will get deleted if I don't clean it up soon, I will make the time. What do you recommend? Is there a recommended format for <ref/ref> entries for photo credits, for articles, for books? I see so many variations on the random pages I have been editing. What I found were many instances of print documents saved on the web by interested and related organizations - but not on the publisher's site, many places where CB was given photo credits, places where his work was acknowledged, places where his articles were mentioned or copied, and places where his job at BBRC was described. But I do not know the proper format for these kinds of citations. I have put <ref/ref> in some articles, with cite web, but only because the information was incrementally/substantially better than what I found in those articles. That is, the information was relevant, even if I got the format wrong. Are there gold standard examples of different types of citations? My plan is to struggle along and make incremental changes, hoping they are useful, letting someone else continue the process of improvement. Is that OK? Can I add relevant material and let others do the editing and formatting? I am fast at the former, and slow at the latter. I started to upload a couple of images, and realized, while trying to answer all the questions, what some of the issues are. I am going to try to get someone who knows CB to upload their photos directly. I found two pictures of CB on the web, in obscure locations. I saved them to my disk as a precaution, in case they are dropped in the coming years. But, only as a last resort. If I provide a link back to the original source, with an appropriate citation, is that sufficient? The upload questions were somewhat hazy. It seems, if you take an image from the web and post it on Wikipedia, if someone asks you to delete it, you do. Otherwise, OK? Can "fair use" be presumed? If so, then I could try to save historically important images and documents that otherwise will not be saved. I found a couple of documents in temporary archives that were written by BBRC, and related organizations, but no longer on their website. That sort of thing. I see quite a few examples like that, where ephemeral materials will be lost if someone doesn't make an archival copy for "humanity". Is Wikipedia that kind of site? I know it shows human knowledge, but does it also preserve heritage/knowledge that would otherwise be lost? I found the images on blog sites, where people were talking to the birding community as friends, sharing images and text they produced themselves. I do not know when the blogs will be purged. Archive.org and Google do not archive these sites as far as I can tell. If I don't save those images, they will probably be lost. I found two representative articles, the only birding ones on the web written by CB, in the google archive. It seems to be blacklisted. At least the editor gave me error messages until I deleted those links. So his ephemeral articles will be lost, unless he or someone else saves them in a permanent location. I was thinking about writing to BBRC to see if they would put their historical reports online again (they were there in the past). If you look at the bottom of British Birds Rarities Committee, you will see a long list of reports. I think all of those links are broken now. and that article is not very old. CB wrote in some of those reports. I think BBRC has a lot of interesting material it published. Is it solely responsible for its preservation and sharing? Sorry to write so much. I have a lot on my mind. The more pages I see and try to improve, the more questions I have. RC711 (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC) I think you will find the answers to all your questions by taking the time to look at the various help pages and the style manual. Getting comfortable with editing does not happen overnight. You may wish to get into the adoption program (see [Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Resources here). For specialist advice in a particular area, try the project talk pages and the reference desk. Good luck. Maias (talk) 01:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Books & Bytes, Issue 6 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes Issue 6, April-May 2014 by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs) New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK) TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)