User talk:LozUK6
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Peter Thornley, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! мαуαηк·αвнιѕнєк talk · contribs 23:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Thornley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. мαуαηк·αвнιѕнєк talk · contribs 23:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
December 2011[edit]
To Mr Lawrence,
Dear Sir,
Please do not input material onto the Kendo Nagasaki page duplicated from the Peter Thornley page. The Kendo Nagasaki page, as noted in its header, is intended as a general page about wrestlers who have used this gimmick - not specifically about its originator. It is worth bearing in mind that most American and Japanese wiki users will be more familar with Kazuo Sakurada's version of the character and this is why the pages have been arranged in this way.There are talkpages on both the Kendo Nagasaki and Peter Thornley pages if you or Mr Thornley have any objections to this arrangement.
I also note that while some of your content might have been constructive had it been input on the Peter Thornley page (material regarding books, films, the website etc) a great deal more of it constituted advertising/spam which is unacceptable on any Wikipedia page as per WP:SPAM.
I regret to note that this is not the first time you have engaged in such activity, therefore I have regarded this as vandalism. On this occasion, in due respect of your connection with Mr Thornley himself and given that no formal warning has been given previously, I am restricting myself to reverting your edits. However should this re-occur I am afraid I shall have to give a more formal warning and subsequently raise this issue at a higher level.
Thank you.95.144.245.184 (talk) 12:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)