User talk:Lord Cornwallis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Sidi-Brahim (film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sidi-Brahim (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Attracta (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Play Girl.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Play Girl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sandy (1926 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sandy (1926 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Her Husband's Wife has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, In your recent edit summary, you note: "Not sure why this was nominated or redirected." To clarify: I had redirected the page to the director as an ATD, because notability was challenged (As for why it was Proded, I guess Donaldd23's concern was notability, as the template indicated). I generally do that to avoid deletion of pages about films with sources/notable cast/director etc. But, I too, would prefer a standalone page for this film. So I agree with your revert of my Redirect, actually. Thanks for creating the page. If you have time to add a plot, that might help show why Redirecting is an even less desirable action. Thanks. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lord Cornwallis, since you created the article , and coming across this image, I was wondering if it would be a better image for the infobx. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 04:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that seems fine. Thanks, Lord Cornwallis (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
 Done and dusted. thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of Charles X of France indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, this is a duplicate of the older category, Category:Cultural depictions of Charles X. If you would like this category to be renamed, please go to WP:CFD speedy renames and make a request. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Darling Caroline (1968 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Darling Caroline (1968 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mirror (1947 film)
added a link pointing to Mistress
The Wreck (1949 film)
added a link pointing to Mistress

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Love encountering a Lord Cornwallis in the new articles feed. I've learned a lot about London plays and British performing arts from clicking! Thank you for all your years of great contributions. jengod (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your kind words. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chicken a La King (film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chicken a La King (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Carousel of Life.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Carousel of Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Julie the Redhead.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Julie the Redhead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:School for Coquettes (1958 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:School for Coquettes (1958 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original titles[edit]

Hello Lord Cornwallis. Firstly let me add my congratulations for the impressive amount of Wikipedia work you have done, especially in adding material about lesser known films of the past. It is an immense achievement over many years.

One matter I would like to raise is the use of original titles in information about foreign-language films. I know that you carefully follow the guidelines about Common name and Use English, but in the case of many older foreign films the issues are not straightforward. I note particularly this section of Naming_conventions_(films)#Foreign-language_films:

"If the film has never been widely released in the English-speaking world, it is not assumed to have a commonly-recognized English name; in such cases, the native name is to be preferred over potentially variant translated titles used in English-language reliable sources."

For me the key issue is not so much the choice of an article title, for which there are always cross-references, but rather the recognisability of a film from its title within an article or filmography. Whichever title Wikipedia editors have decided upon, the fact remains that some people will identify a film by its English title while others will know it only by its original title. The most helpful response is therefore to provide both titles wherever possible, following the examples at WP:NCFF.

My remarks are prompted by recent changes in the article on Charles Spaak, to which we have both contributed. That filmography now has mixture of titles in English and in French, instead of the previous list of the French ones which was admittedly deficient but it was consistent. When such articles need to be edited, I think the best solution is to add a missing title rather than to substitute it for one already there, thereby preserving rather than deleting potentially useful information. This should assist the maximum number of people to recognise which films are which. That is the practice I would like to follow, and indeed more consistently than I may have done in the past. With best wishes, Lampernist (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]