User talk:LilyLiam31

Welcome![edit]

Hello, LilyLiam31, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Disney's The Unexpected Person, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Disney's The Unexpected Person[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Disney's The Unexpected Person, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Disney's The Unexpected Person. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 22:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nora Menken[edit]

Hello LilyLiam31,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nora Menken for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LavaBaron (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Nora Menken. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Finngall ^talk 14:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Nora Menken. --Finngall ^talk 17:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janis Menken for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janis Menken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janis Menken until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Finngall ^talk 18:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Janis Menken. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Datbubblegumdoe (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly removing an "articles for deletion " notice from an article. You have done this at least six times, continuing after twice being told that doing so was unacceptable. In view of your earlier similar history regarding speedy deletion tags, a 24 hour block is minimal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Anna Menken[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Anna Menken. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Anna Rose Menken. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Anna Rose Menken – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Redirect on Anna Menken[edit]

I saw you remove the redirect tag on the page Anna Menken and continued to create the article. This article already exists at Anna Rose Menken and needs to be left as a redirect to that page. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Anna Menken. Stop removing the redirect as this is the same person!! Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC) IMDB IS THE ONE WHO CAN WRITE IN NOT LIKE YOU BITCHES WHO NOT CAN TRUST TO, FUCK YOU SOON NO ONE WOULD WRITE ON YOUR FUCKING WIKIPEDIA EVEN IF YOU LICK OUR ASS !!!!!!!![reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing and for making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Screams (film 1996)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Screams (film 1996), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Baseball Watcher 18:36, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]