User talk:Leckhure Omamösenlecker

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leckhure Omamösenlecker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

new username

Decline reason:

Your name is unwelcome, your contributions are unwelcome. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I maybe wrote my answer in the wrong place, because i'm new and don't find the right place, and when my name is a problem, i can change it or let it change

What were you going to change it too? Grandpa's cock sucker? You found your way to Commons as well, I noticed. Admins, please see the link I placed to a Commons discussion on this talk page, below. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Franzbrötchen" would be a good name.

Pornography[edit]

Hello. While Wikipedia is not censored, the content you recently added at Glossary of BDSM did not seem to enhance the encyclopedia, and has since been removed from the article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images § Offensive images and Commons:What Commons is not § Commons is not an amateur porn site for more information.

Wikipedia does include sexual content for the purposes of education, including images which some may find offensive. However, please know that Wikipedia is not a pornography website, and editing the encyclopedia's contents in order to sexually degrade/humiliate yourself runs counter to our goals. There is no policy which outright disallows Wikipedia editors from using nude photographs of themselves for encyclopedic purposes, but please do so with discretion and decency. RoxySaunders (talk · contribs) 00:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is much more on Wikipedia that people can find offensive than that picture, so this is just your personal judgement and view. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cock_and_ball_torture

The picture is a good explanation to the text, and yes, i use a personal pic, because i have the copyright.

March 2022[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Admins, see also this. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]