User talk:Kyle Peake/Archive 12
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
KSI discography
Hello Kyle, do you think that you could help to resolve a dispute in KSI's discography. An editor is claiming KSI is not a featured artist on Nathan Dawe - Lighter (feat. KSI), but instead a main artist. See the talk page for more info. Your help would be very appreciated. Thanks -- Timwikisidemen 13:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC).
- Timwikisidemen I have chimed in to the discussion now, thank you for seeking out others to try and solve the dispute properly. --K. Peake 13:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For tirelessly contributing and reviewing GA nominations. This is for your consistent efforts. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 19:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Ashleyyoursmile Massive thanks for the barnstar, I have enjoyed reviewing your GANs like I always enjoy contributing to work on the GANs page! --K. Peake 21:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey Kyle. I was wondering if you could make it a priority to review Lodger (album)? I wanna take it to FAC but wanna make it a GA first and frankly, I don't wanna wait long :-P. To return the favor, I would happily review one of your GANs next time you nominate one (unless you have one up now, then I'd review that – I haven't checked the page in awhile). I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks :-) – zmbro (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro Yes, I would be happy to review it sometime soon but one piece of advice I'd give to you is to try and use "the album" and the title once a para each. --K. Peake 06:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro Had a lot on my plate here recently, but I will review two more articles before doing Lodger; how does that sound to you? --K. Peake 07:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yep take your time! :-) – zmbro (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro I will be glad to take it on soon, but I would like to ask does it matter what I said about writing the title or "the album" more than once in a para or is that considered to be acceptable? --K. Peake 19:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Everyone has different writing styles. For me, I'm only going to mention the album title or "the album" when it warrants it. You definitely shouldn't force it. When I'm reading an article I'm not going to forget what I'm reading every 2-3 sentences. Also, during Hunky Dory's FAC run, I received complaints that I wrote "the album" and the title WAY too often, so I've tried my best to limit use of those; I also sometimes try to use "record" instead of "album" for variety. That make sense? – zmbro (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah that is totally understandable because everyone has their own writing style really, but I was more questioning if there was a MOS rule of sorts about how much a title should be mentioned per para in the lead though there isn't I guess. Reviewing should go well tomorrow! --K. Peake 21:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Everyone has different writing styles. For me, I'm only going to mention the album title or "the album" when it warrants it. You definitely shouldn't force it. When I'm reading an article I'm not going to forget what I'm reading every 2-3 sentences. Also, during Hunky Dory's FAC run, I received complaints that I wrote "the album" and the title WAY too often, so I've tried my best to limit use of those; I also sometimes try to use "record" instead of "album" for variety. That make sense? – zmbro (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro I will be glad to take it on soon, but I would like to ask does it matter what I said about writing the title or "the album" more than once in a para or is that considered to be acceptable? --K. Peake 19:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yep take your time! :-) – zmbro (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro Had a lot on my plate here recently, but I will review two more articles before doing Lodger; how does that sound to you? --K. Peake 07:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Good Article Barnstar | |
| I'm giving you this barnstar in recognition of your great contributions on Wikipedia and your countless reviews on GA nominations. Your work is much appreciated, THANK YOU!--Lorik17 (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Iaof2017 Thank you a lot, it has been an honour reviewing many GANs and it is even more of one to receive this barnstar!!! --K. Peake 19:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clique (song)
The article Clique (song) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Clique (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey Kyle! I was wondering if you could help me out? I am hoping to bring Don't Start Now to FA in the future but in my peer review of the article, I was told that my prose could use some work. I was hoping you could help me with it as you always do such a great job on the proses of GAs. Thanks. LOVI33 15:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- LOVI33 Hello there, thanks for your comments; I will try to take a look tomorrow. --K. Peake 22:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- LOVI33 I am not going to go into too much detail since this is not an actual FAC. But I would suggest for the lead to only write the title once a para, use the song instead of the track for consistency and avoid overusage of it (the latter of the three is present throughout). I also think you need to use more appropriate tense for the critical reception, as the song still exists in the same form after the reviews so words like "is" should often be used in place of those like "was". --K. Peake 13:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much Kyle Peake! I have implemented your suggestions. I have also just nominated it for FA. Could you leave some comments on it? That would help me out a lot. LOVI33 22:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- LOVI33 Yes I will later today; I have nominated Kids See Ghosts for FA if you would care to leave any comments. --K. Peake 07:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much Kyle Peake! I have implemented your suggestions. I have also just nominated it for FA. Could you leave some comments on it? That would help me out a lot. LOVI33 22:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- LOVI33 I am not going to go into too much detail since this is not an actual FAC. But I would suggest for the lead to only write the title once a para, use the song instead of the track for consistency and avoid overusage of it (the latter of the three is present throughout). I also think you need to use more appropriate tense for the critical reception, as the song still exists in the same form after the reviews so words like "is" should often be used in place of those like "was". --K. Peake 13:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
FAC
Hey Kyle, thanks for passing "100k on a Coupe". I was wondering if you could leave some comments for "Mood Swings" at FAC? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss Yes I will try to later today. --K. Peake 07:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss It was good to leave my comments yesterday, but do you think you can contribute some for Kids See Ghosts at FAC? --K. Peake 08:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) GA review
Hi Kyle, sorry about a few incomplete changes being marked as done. Hopefully the article is better now. Thanks --Timwikisidemen 17:03, 28 January 2021 {UTC)
- Timwikisidemen Make sure to check properly that you have implemented the changes before marking them as done; the article looks a good amount better and all you need to do now is wikilink Billboard Global Excl. U.S. as done here and fix the Apple Music/Spotify refs accordingly. --K. Peake 17:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work on Lighter (Nathan Dawe song). Hope to work with you again in the future -- Timwikisidemen 21:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For all your amazing reviews of the 1975 articles. You have gone above and beyond to ensure that you provide speedy, fair and thorough reviews. Thank you! Giacobbe talk 13:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |
- (CA)Giacobbe Thank you very much for this barnstar, I did not reply yesterday due to other ventures but it is always great reviewing your articles and I look forward to doing so again in the future! --K. Peake 09:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Dior
I was wondering if you could review the "Dior" GAN? It has almost been a year since Pop Smoke was murdered and I want to honor him by making one of his mixtapes good topic. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss I will try to review the article sometime soon, but that will likely be in a day or more's time. As for the GT, that is great to aim for and good luck with the mixtape when it is nominated! --K. Peake 13:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Dancing on My Own Revisit
I'll be waiting a month or two to submit any GA re-nomination if someone else doesn't first to let the dust settle from yesterday's situation with another editor. Felt you deserved a status update. I'm not sure if you'd even be the one addressing the new submission but I addressed most of the work you had done so far for the Intro and Inspiration as reflected with the checklist in its Talk section. If you do end up doing it I'll do my best to address each point that comes up including cuts. Thanks again for your time. Onan808 (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Onan808 I would have suggested re-opening the review, but if it is as far as a month or more like is appropriate, then it will be best to open a new one. Thank you for your effort to address the concerns as well as negotiate with me! --K. Peake 19:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I should've looked up the difference between re-opening a prior review vs. opening a new one altogether. Is doing the former a matter of simply undoing the action on the talk page? Onan808 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The easiest way is to undo this edit which was not a method discussed at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. Since there is no formal method of withdrawing a nomination, Onan808 should ask Kyle to put it on hold until further notice. At that time, the review can be resumed. Note that Wikipedia:Good article criteria includes the requirement for an article to be written with concise prose. Binksternet (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Given your actions thus far I was the impression you could, no would override/force that process but I guess you need my words verbatim: Kyle, please put this nomination on hold. If there's a way to give a suggestion on Wiki adding a formal process at some point in the future of withdrawing a nomination I'd love to see it. I was originally going to work with Kyle alone on edits to satisfy Good Article Criteria but solely because you're involved I'm no longer interested. Thanks. Onan808 (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Onan808 I have re-opened the review now and placed it on hold, but how long should I wait until making further comments? --K. Peake 18:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Kyle, please don't wait - you can start edits again. I originally was going to let the nomination run out of the clock after it's ~7 day hold window to be rejected as I wasn't interested following Binksternet's involvement but I didn't want to put your effort thus far to waste nor continue to waste your time. I'll address that editor's issues/behavior on a case by case basis when and if it comes up but for now you'll see I addressed your points with a checklist on the Talk Page from what you posted so far that I just completed. The amount of time any large cuts will take once you get further down will probably take longer than the seven day window so the article will likely get rejected anyways but at least some progress will get made. Thanks again for your help Onan808 (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Onan808 I have re-opened the review now and placed it on hold, but how long should I wait until making further comments? --K. Peake 18:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Given your actions thus far I was the impression you could, no would override/force that process but I guess you need my words verbatim: Kyle, please put this nomination on hold. If there's a way to give a suggestion on Wiki adding a formal process at some point in the future of withdrawing a nomination I'd love to see it. I was originally going to work with Kyle alone on edits to satisfy Good Article Criteria but solely because you're involved I'm no longer interested. Thanks. Onan808 (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- The easiest way is to undo this edit which was not a method discussed at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. Since there is no formal method of withdrawing a nomination, Onan808 should ask Kyle to put it on hold until further notice. At that time, the review can be resumed. Note that Wikipedia:Good article criteria includes the requirement for an article to be written with concise prose. Binksternet (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- I should've looked up the difference between re-opening a prior review vs. opening a new one altogether. Is doing the former a matter of simply undoing the action on the talk page? Onan808 (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Onan808 I will most likely look at the review again today, though I will verify whether you have implemented the suggested changes before going over other sections. Also, you do not need to worry about the probability of the on hold status remaining for over a week, as it is only advised to give this status to articles for such a timeframe, meaning exceptions can easily be made especially for massive articles like the one in question. --K. Peake 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure if you had seen my new response to your other comment on my Talk page so I'm copy/pasting it here. If you already had, please disregard this and/or delete, etc. First, thanks again for your time. I'll continue my system on the talk page addressing each of the points one by one when I can and will personally sign them that I'll expect you won't obviously have to follow back-up on one-by-one as that would be quite time consuming, etc. - I'm not sure of your system but can certainly address what I can then renominate. Each point response is mostly for me to have it on the record in the meantime in case someone else picks up substantial edits. My own personal renomination may take weeks or months from now, depending on the activity of other users including their requests for a review and changes.Onan808 (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 23:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song)
The article Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song)
The article Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Reborn (Kids See Ghosts song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
AFD
Update I have nominated 100k on a Coupe, Christopher Walking, and War (Pop Smoke song) if you want to participate. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss I appreciate the good faith edits, but none of these should be AFDs. Two of them passed as GAs under my watch because they met the notability and good article criteria, also looking at "Christopher Walking", it seems to be notable too. I would suggest retracting these three nominations immediately, as there is no real case. --K. Peake 06:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Ga
I’ll respond to the GA for Shake the Room tomorrow, but can you review Leave It All to Me? It is a short article. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss Unfortunately I am in the midst of another review right now, so it may be another day or two until I get to the above article. Look forward to seeing your response tomorrow though! --K. Peake 10:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss Will you respond before I begin my review of the other article? --K. Peake 21:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I will as soon as I get home. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amazing (Kanye West song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Williams.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Shake the room
I have finished responding to your concerns for the GA. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss That is good and I will a look now; did not do so earlier because your mention was not received by me for some reason. --K. Peake 15:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
GA
Can you review the GA for “Hello”? The article is short so I’ll be able to respond quickly. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss Hello (in the literal sense), I will review "Leave It All to Me" first since that is of a similar size but it is older. Afterwards, I'll see what I've got and may take on "Hello". --K. Peake 07:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Happy editing, sir
isento (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Isento Thank you very much, not the type of image I'd expect as an editing reward but very nice since I do like cats a lot!! --K. Peake 12:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Good article backlog drive in March
 | March 2021 Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive starts on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. |
(t · c) buidhe 04:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: Thanks a lot for notifying me, I look forward to taking part in my third GAN drive! --K. Peake 07:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Fire (Kids See Ghosts song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fire (Kids See Ghosts song), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire (Kids See Ghosts song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
AfD double voting
Hello, I have struck your 2nd vote in this and this AfD, as you cannot vote multiple times within the same discussion. A relisted discussion is done to help determine a clearer consensus by inviting additional expressions of opinion into the discussion from uninvolved editors, not to allow existing contributors to the discussion an opportunity to revote. If you have additional comments to make, you can reply to your original vote or write a new entry that clearly states it is a "comment". Thanks. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Bungle Sorry, I thought it was considered fine to submit a vote again after relisting like it was a reelection. --K. Peake 21:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, that isn't how it works. In a discussion, votes/opinions/comments are all considered from the start of the AfD. A relist is simply a way of inviting additional editors to express an opinion in the hope that more opinions can provide a clearer overall consensus. Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey Kyle! I made a few edits to Flashing Lights (Kanye West song) last night and noticed something that I wanted your opinion on. At the top, there's a notice saying "not to be confused with "All of the Lights"". That page has the same notice – "not to be confused with "Flashing Lights". I didn't look into when these were put on there, but are these really necessary? Imo, those two songs aren't really indistinguishable, and West has made it clear on numerous occasions that he's obsessed with lights: here, here, here, here, and not to mention the two above. The point is, I think these notices on these two pages can be removed, but I wanted to know your thoughts on the subject first before it got reverted. Thanks man.
Side note: "Flashing Lights" could really use a good clean-up (the majority of the commercial performance refs are dead and couldn't be saved by the bot). – zmbro (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Zmbro Thank for notifying me of this hatnote's appearance on both of the articles. I believe it is unwarranted and fully support the removal, as the songs are highly unlikely to be confused with one another due to West having released many songs related to lights like you pointed out and how apart from that, they have literally no words in common. I do think "Flashing Lights" is lacking somewhat, which is unfortunate because it is one of West's classics; I may expand it in the future for a potential GA since the song does have enough coverage, how's that sound? --K. Peake 21:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Therefore I Am
I was wondering if you could review the GA for "Therefore I Am (song)? It's been a while since I've done a Billie Eilish article. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss I do like that song rather a lot actually and the article does look mostly good, but I will wait until you have finished the review of "Freeee" first since that has been open for quite a few days now. --K. Peake 08:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Finished the review. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Boss The above article will be next in my queue; I'm just in the midst of a different review right now. --K. Peake 10:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Finished the review. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2)
The article Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2)
The article Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)